Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 7 Average score and rank of suggested solutions for ecosystem conservation among different groups in the sample

From: Local perception of ecosystem services and their conservation in Sudanian savannas of Burkina Faso (West Africa)

Informants

Awareness of degradation

Fire prohibition

Subsidy from the government

Inspection and reforestation

Inclusive management

Global

2.27

1.75

1.42

1.28

0.95

Age classes

     

 Young

2.25

1.98

1.40

1.08

0.80

 Adult

2.43

1.62

1.65

1.16

0.94

 Elders

2.00

1.64

1.04

1.81

1.23

Sociocultural groups

     

 Dagara_B

2.40

0.92

2.78

1.46

1.20

 Dagara_D

2.84

3.52

0.80

1.30

0.26

 Pougouli

2.25

2.45

0.30

1.55

1.40

 Mossi_B

2.05

1.00

1.60

0.75

0.50

 Mossi_N

1.92

1.40

1.14

1.04

0.76

 Kassena

2.02

1.20

1.34

1.40

1.58

Gender

     

 Men

2.44

1.20

1.64

1.33

1.28

 Women

2.10

2.31

1.20

1.22

0.62

  1. Emphasis: Bold—1st rank, italic—2nd rank, bold italics—3rd rank; Sociocultural groups: Dagara_B: Dagara of TWRB; Dagara_D: Dagara of CAD; Mossi_N: Mossi of GRN; Mossi_B: Mossi of TWRB
Back to article page

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine

ISSN: 1746-4269

Contact us