- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Animals traded for traditional medicine in Ghana: their zootherapeutic uses and implications for biodiversity conservation
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine volume 21, Article number: 21 (2025)
Abstract
The use of animals for zootherapeutic purposes has been reported worldwide, and with the patronage of complementary and alternative medicines being on the ascendency, the trade and use of animal parts will only escalate. Many more of these animals used in traditional medicine will be pushed to extinction if policies for their sustainable use and conservation are not formulated. There have been studies across the world which assessed the trade and use of animals in traditional medicine including Ghana. However, all previous Ghanaian studies were conducted in a few specific cities. It therefore makes it imperative for a nationwide study which would provide more comprehensive information on the trade and use of animals in traditional medicine and its conservation implications. Using direct observation and semi-structured questionnaires, data were collected from 133 vendors of animal parts used in traditional medicines in 48 markets located across all 16 administrative regions of Ghana. Analysis of the data showed that the trade in wild animal parts for traditional medicine was more prevalent in the urban centres of Ghana. Overall, 75 identifiable animal species were traded on Ghanaian traditional medicine markets. Using their relative frequency of citation values, chameleons (Chamaeleo spp.; 0.81), lions (Panthera leo; 0.81) and the West African crocodile (Crocodylus suchus; 0.67) were the most commonly traded animals in Ghana. Majority of the vendors (59.1%) indicated that their clients use the animal parts for medicinal purposes mainly for skin diseases, epilepsy and fractures, while clients of 28.2% of the vendors use the animal parts for spiritual or mystical purposes, such as protection against spiritual attacks, spiritual healing and money rituals. Up to 54.2% of the animals were classified as Least Concern by IUCN, 14.7% were threatened, with 51.2% of CITES-listed ones experiencing a decreasing population trend. This study also found that 68.5% of the traded animal species are not listed on CITES, but among those listed, 69.6% are classified under Appendix II. Considering the level of representation of animals of conservation concerns, the harvesting and trade of animal parts for traditional medicine must be regulated. This call is even more urgent since 40.0% of the top ten traded animals are mammals; a class of animals with long gestation periods and are not prolific breeders.
Introduction
Humans interact with both biotic and abiotic components of their environment including animals. The interactions between humans and animals predate history, with several rock paintings of animals such as horses, bison and deer, , found in caves of the Palaeolithic period signifying the roles animals play in the lives of people [6, 48]. Human–animal interaction continues even up to the present, as humans have been able to domesticate some animals for food, as pets and for other purposes. Although this interaction had existed for thousands of years, it was only until the later parts of the nineteenth century that the area of study termed ethnozoology was born. This refers to ‘the study of the knowledge people possess about fauna in their localities and the culturally-mediated relations that humans develop with these animals in the environments surrounding them’ [6, 11].
To survive, humans have over the years made efforts to reduce or eliminate the discomfort associated with diseases and prevent fatality by the use of various techniques and substances mostly from their immediate environment, referred to as traditional medicine [33]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that up to 80% of the world’s population depends on traditional medicines from animals and plants, especially to take care of their primary health needs [79]. However, the proportion varies around the world with a study in Ethiopia recording a high 90% percentage use of natural materials as their traditional medicine [56, 74, 80]. There is no doubt that the use of plants in traditional medicine far outweighs that of animals. However, a plethora of records showed the use of animals and/or their products by various cultures from olden times to the present period of modern civilisation [7, 34, 48, 68, 80].
With increasing human populations and interest in the use of natural products for the healthcare needs of persons even in the highly technologically developed countries, there is increased demand for traditional medicine. This has resulted in the overexploitation of numerous wild animal species with dire consequences for the survival of the ecosystem since the extinction of such animals would lead to the loss of the very important ecosystem services and goods obtained from them [23, 73]. There are several examples of some animals whose use in traditional medicine has led to a threat to their existence. The vulture population in West Africa has declined due to several factors including their use for traditional medicine [14, 26, 30]. According to Daboné et al. [26], between the 1970s and 2019, the Hooded Vultures Necrosyrtes monachus population in the West African sub-region has declined by 58–65%. In Burkina Faso, the number of Hooded Vultures per 100 km decreased from 122 to 75 over the last five decades which is a decline of 38% [26]. The effect of the use of vultures in traditional medicine on their survival was succinctly illustrated by Ogada et al. [55] who reported that the trade of these vultures for traditional medicine accounted for 29% of the nearly eight thousand vulture deaths recorded across twenty-six countries in Africa. Another animal under threat as a result of their use in traditional medicine is the wild tiger. Tigers have a home range in southern and south-eastern Asia, and large areas of China [81]. The use of tiger bones for rheumatism and related ailments, the skin made into magical amulets and the penis being an ingredient of allegedly powerful sexual tonics in Asia are making tiger parts, items of great demand [53, 27]. According to David Shepherd Wildlife Foundation, [27], as few as 3800 tigers remain in the wild, a 96% population decline over a century with their extinction reported in Laos, Vietnam and Cambodia since 2010.
The use of animals as medicines in health care is not delineated by location, economic endowment or the culture of people. Several studies have reported the use of animal-based products in traditional medicine in developed countries such as Spain, China, Brazil and Japan [8, 25, 39, 49, 64]. The Brazilain study by Alves et al. [8] reported the use of various parts and products of 37 species for conditions such as asthma, epilepsy, body aches and wound healing, among others in the city of Santa Cruz. In Japan, as reported by Takahashi et al. [64], gallstone Calculus bovis from cattle is used in traditional medicine against anti-arrhythmic events. African countries such as South Africa [60], Benin [31] and Nigeria [1, 2, 68] have also reported the use of animal-based medicines among their population. From Benin, Djagoun et al. [31] found 87 wild mammals used in traditional medicine. Adeola [1] reported that some animals such as Gorilla gorilla, Pan troglodytes and Orycteropus afer were used as aphrodisiacs. In the Oyo State of Nigeria, Ajagun et al. [2] reported that 43 animals, especially Chamaeleo senegalensis, Bufo regularis, Felis silvestris and Eidolon helvum, are used in the treatments of epilepsy, rheumatism, fever, wound healing and mystical purposes such as spiritual protection, command of authority and favour. In Ghana, Ntiamoa-Baidu [54] and Dove [32] found the use of some animal parts and their products in traditional medicine. Boakye, et al. [19] conducted a study in Kumasi, the second-largest city in Ghana, and showed that various parts of the African pangolins (Phataginus tetradactyla), white-bellied pangolin (Phataginus tricuspis) and the giant ground pangolin (Smutsia gigantea) are employed in traditional medicine in the city. The scales of the pangolin were reportedly used for mystical purposes such as spiritual protection and financial rituals but also for the treatment of rheumatism and convulsions. In terms of the number of animal species being traded for traditional medicine in Ghana, Boakye et al. [21] reported 32 species in the Kumasi Central market, while Gbogbo and Daniels [35] recorded 43 species from their study in Accra, the capital city of Ghana.
Variations in ecological zones in Ghana as well as the specific cultural requirements across the country could bring about differences in the types of animals used in traditional medicine across Ghana and hence the need to undertake possibly the first-of-its-kind national survey. The increasing interest in animal-based traditional medicine also presents some possibility of extinction if they are not sustainably extracted. Consequently, it is imperative to assess the conservation implications of the trade of these animals in Ghana. To this end, the present study assessed the trade and use of animals in traditional medicine across all 16 administrative regions of Ghana and evaluated the conservation implications of the trade. Besides determining the zootherapeutic uses of these animal parts, the study further assessed the taxonomic classes of importance in traditional medicine in Ghana and whether the ecological zone of a traditional medicine market would influence the species diversity.
Study area
The Republic of Ghana with a land size of 238,540 km2 and a population of 30.8 million people as of 2021 is located in West Africa (Fig. 1) and bordered to the east by the Republic of Togo, the west by La Cote D’Ivoire, the north by Burkina Faso and the south by the Gulf of Guinea and the Atlantic Ocean [15, 37]. Based on the variations in rainfall patterns and the vegetation cover, Ghana is made up of four major ecological zones: coastal savanna, forest, transitional and guinea savanna [78].
The coastal savanna is a strip of land of about 20,000 km2 area covering the south-eastern coast of Ghana including areas near the capital, Accra. The forest zone, classified into rain forest and semi-deciduous forest, covers a land area of 135,670 km2 including areas to the midsection of the country from the south-western parts across to the eastern part. The rainfall pattern in the forest zone is bi-modal, giving a semi-equatorial climate while the vegetation is a semi-deciduous forest [78]. The Guinea savanna zone covers a total land area of about 125,430 km2 and experiences a tropical continental climate [78]. The transitional zone is a forest–savanna ecological space between the Guinea savanna of northern Ghana and the semi-deciduous forest of the south and runs from the west to the eastern part of the country [46]. With this diversity of vegetation, Ghana is reported to harbour 221 amphibian and reptile species, 724 bird species and 225 mammalian species [16].
According to Attuquayefio and Fobil [13], efforts to protect the forest and its resources in Ghana started in 1906 when the colonial government enacted a law against the felling of commercial trees and subsequently established the Forestry Department in 1909. According to IUCN/PACO [42], there are 21 Wildlife Protected Areas in Ghana occupying a land space of 13,476 km2 or 5.6% of the country. The protected area network includes one Strict Nature Reserve, seven National Parks, two Wildlife Sanctuaries, six Resource Reserves, five coastal wetlands and one inland wetland.
Methods
Study design
A cross-sectional study design was employed in the collection of data from vendors of animal-based traditional medicines in 48 markets in major towns and cities across the 16 administrative regions of Ghana. The fieldwork began in January 2020 and ended in July 2022.
Research tools
A semi-structured questionnaire and an interview guide were pretested and used to collect the data. Audio/video devices were used in recording the interactions between the researchers and the respondents. The recorded conversations were repeatedly played, and the responses were appropriately entered into Microsoft Excel. Photographs of animal samples were taken and catalogued. The questionnaire and the interview guide were developed de novo for a Doctor of Philosophy degree programme at the Department of Animal Biology and Conservation Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra. The questionnaire was divided into various sections for the collection of data on the vendor's sociodemographic characteristics, market characteristics, practice information, level of patronage of animal parts and their roles in traditional medicine, socioeconomic importance of the animal-based medicine trade, and vendor’s knowledge of and conservation concerns. For vendors who permitted the taking of inventory of their animal parts being traded for traditional medicine, after taking photographs of a sample, the vendors were interviewed on the roles of these animals in traditional medicine.
Sample size determination
The sample size for the vendors in this study was determined based on a similar nationwide survey among traditional medicine vendors in the Republic of Benin [31]. The Benin study surveyed a total of 22 markets in 18 districts out of the 77 from which 110 vendors were interviewed. With the landmass of Ghana (238,535 km2) being 2.1 times larger than Benin’s (114,763 km2), surveying approximately 46 markets and interacting with more than 110 vendors who are knowledgeable about the use of these animals in traditional medicine were considered appropriate. In this study, 133 qualified vendors who mainly sold dried animal parts for traditional medicine were successfully enrolled for the study. In addition to the animal parts, a few vendors sold other items such as herbs, strips of red, black or white fabric and metal amulets. However, only 42 permitted the taking of inventory of the animal parts they had among their wares with all but a few allowing the researchers to take photographs of the animal wares.
Sampling techniques
In markets with three or fewer vendors, all were selected to participate in the study. However, where there were more than three willing vendors, the convenience sampling technique was applied in selecting a maximum of three vendors. The three respondents selected were those who displayed animal wares of the greatest species diversity.
Sample identification
Since the animals on display were mostly not whole pieces, the vendors using their knowledge of their morphological features and other characteristics provided the researchers with the local names or common names of the animal species. However, where the listed animal or part was identified by the authors as a different animal from what the vendors claimed they were, we reported the vendors’ claims in asterisks. Photographs of these animal parts were taken and compared with images from reference books such as The Kingdom Field Guide to African Mammals [45] and Lézards, crocodiles et tortues d’Afrique Occidentale et du Sahara [69]. For whole animals or parts that the on-field researchers could not identify, their photographs were reviewed by experts at the University of Ghana and the Wildlife Division of the Forestry Commission of Ghana.
Data analysis
Data underwent validation, editing and coding in Microsoft Excel. Data analysis was performed using the statistical software SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 26, Microsoft Excel, Version 2208 and GraphPad Prism, Version 10.2.3. Descriptive statistical methods such as measures of frequency as tables and graphs were applied. The quantitative ethnobiological parameter, relative frequency of citation (RFC), was used to assess the relative importance of the various animals used for traditional medicine in Ghana.
The RFC was obtained by dividing the number of vendors who are trading in a species they indicate to be used in traditional medicine (Fc) by the total number of participants in the survey (N) [65]
Conservation status
The conservation status of all the listed animals was determined using the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List Categories and Criteria (2022–2 Version) internet site https://www.iucnredlist.org/. This also provided information on the population trend of the animals. The level of trade control of the animals was indicated as measured by the CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) Appendices I, II and III through a search engine on https://www.speciesplus.net/.
Ethical considerations
Ethical clearance with certificate number ECBAS 011/20–21 was provided by the Ethics Committee for Basic and Applied Science of the University of Ghana. During the collection of data, the participants were informed that accepting to be a participant was indicative of consent. The approved consent form was not used because vendors were apprehensive about signing documents because they were not sure whether the researcher was investigating their activities.
Results
Sociodemographic characteristics of vendors of animals for traditional medicine
The sociodemographic characteristics of vendors of animal-based medicines are shown in Table 1. The majority of the respondents were males (81; 60.9%), married (97; 75.2%) and believers of the Islam religion (56; 65.6%). Most of them were also between the ages of 51–60 years (57; 38.6%), had no formal education (41; 31.1%), plied their trade in open stalls (63; 48.5%), traded in markets located in the peri-urban communities in Ghana (52; 39.4%) and also traded in the Guinea savanna ecozone of Ghana (57; 42.9%). Majority of the vendors (65; 59.1%) indicated that their clients used animal parts mainly as medicines, while 31 (28.2%) indicated that they were for ritual or spiritual purposes.
Diseases clients treat using ABM
The top ten diseases that animal parts were used to treat were; (i) skin disorders such as rashes, infections, ulcers, sores and chicken pox (38; 11.2%), (ii) epilepsy (18; 5.3%), (iii) fracture (16; 4.7%), (iv) swollen legs and other inflammations (15; 4.4%), (v) arthritis (13; 3.8%), (vi) abdominal pains (11; 3.2%), (vii) boils (11; 3.2%), (viii) convulsion (11; 3.2%), (ix) hypertension (11; 3.2%) and (x) infertility (11; 3.2%) (Table 2).
Animals used for spiritual or ritual purposes
Among the top 10 spiritually related uses, the most important was for protection against spiritual attacks (120; 41.8%). Other uses included (i) healing of spiritually related diseases (20; 7.0%), (ii) performance of money rituals (17; 5.9%), (iii) conferring of fearfulness and physical strength (15; 5.2%), (iv) love charms (13; 4.5%), (v) raising the profile of trade or business to attract more clients (13; 4.5%), (vi) charming people for their possessions or attention (12; 4.2%), (vii) reversal of curses (11; 3.8%), (viii) conferring success in life or promotion at workplace (10; 3.5%) and (ix) attracting good luck (8; 2.8%). Table 3 shows the mystical uses clients of the vendors indicated they use the animal parts for in traditional medicine.
Animal species traded in traditional medicine, their distribution in the ecological zones of Ghana and their conservation status
Based on the relative frequency of citation of the animals sold for traditional medicine in Ghana, the top 10 (Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12) most frequently sold animals out of the total of 75 identifiable animal species in the Ghanaian market are as follows (Table 4): (i) chameleons (Chamaeleo spp.; 0.81), (ii) lions (Panthera leo; 0.81), (iii) West African crocodiles (Crocodylus suchus; 0.67), (iv) elephants (Loxodonta africana; 0.62), (v) ‘tigers’ (Panthera tigris; 0.57), (vi) tortoises (Kinixys homeana. 0.55), (vii) pythons (Python sebae/Python regius; 0.52), (viii) patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas; 0.48), (ix) hedgehogs (Atelerix albiventris; 0.4) and (x) African electric catfish (Malapterurus electricus; 0.4). Animal species traded for traditional medicine in Ghana belong to 73 taxonomic families. Animals belonging to the Bovidae family (6; 8.2%) followed by the Felidae (5; 6.8%) were the most represented families. Other notable families with (2; 2.7%) members were the Equidae, Canidae, Muridae and Accipitridae. Whereas some animal species were found in all four major ecological zones, there were others found in fewer than four ecozones.
Distribution of animals traded for traditional medicine in the four main ecological zones in Ghana
Tables 5 and 6 show the distribution of the animal species traded in the four ecological zones; coastal savanna, forest, transitional and Guinea savanna. Up to 59 (78.7%) of the 75 animal species recorded nationally in this survey were found in the transitional/Guinea savanna ecozones, followed by the forest ecozone, 54 (72.0%) with the least of the numbers found in the coastal savanna ecozone, 49 (65.3%) (Table 5). There was, however, no significant difference in the number of animal species recorded across the ecological zones in Ghana (p-value = 0.1914). Most, 25 (33.3%) of the 75 animal species found in this national survey were present in all four ecozones. Besides the 25 animal species, 10 (13.3%) were present in all other three areas but not the transitional zone. For the individual ecozones, the Guinea savanna presented 11 (14.7%) animal species not found in any other zone with the forest and coastal savanna also recording 7 (9.3%) and 4 (5.3%), respectively (Table 6).
Conservation status and trade control levels of animals traded for traditional medicine
Table 7 shows categorisation of animals traded for traditional medicine based on the IUCN and CITES classification schemes. Majority of animals (38; 52.8%) are of Least Concern, 11 (15.3%) are Threatened, five (6.9%) are Vulnerable, five (6.9%) are Endangered and one (1.4%) are Critically Endangered. Although most (24; 32.9%) of the animals were not listed, a good number were on a decreasing population trend (21; 28.8%) increasing to 52.5% if the unlisted and unknown animals were excluded. Majority of the animals (51; 69.9%) are not listed in any of the CITES Appendices but for those listed, most of them were under Appendix II (16; 21.9%) with the proportion in this category increasing to 72.7% after the exclusion of the unlisted animals.
Phyla and classes of animals traded for traditional medicine in Ghana
Animals belonging to four phyla and 11 classes were being traded for traditional medicine in Ghanaian markets (Fig. 13). Majority (65; 86.7%) of these animals belong to the phylum Chordata, followed by Mollusca (5; 6.7%), Arthropoda (3; 4.0%) and Echinodermata (2; 2.7%). Most of the animals belonged to the taxonomic class Mammalia (37; 49.3%), followed by the Aves (15; 20.0%), the Reptilia (11; 14.7%) and then the Gastropoda (4; 5.3%). Whereas two animals (2.7%) were in the class Insecta, other classes such as the Actinopterygii, Amphibia, Arachnida, Asteroidea, Cephalopoda and Echinoidea were each represented by one animal (1.3%).
Discussion
Characteristics of vendors of animal-based medicines in Ghana
This study found that about two-thirds of the vendors were males (60.9%) contrary to most previous studies in Nigeria [2, 52, 63] and Ghana [35], where the majority or all of the vendors were females. Studies in Togo, Nigeria and South Africa, however, reported the involvement of more males in the animal-based medicine trade [28, 41, 68]. The difference could be the inclusion criteria in this study which required that a qualified vendor should be able to tell the uses of at least one of the animal parts he or she sold. In most markets, the women vendors claimed only sold these items without knowing what patrons used them for.
This study also found that about two-thirds (65.6%) of the vendors were adherents of the Islamic faith, similar to reports by Ajagun et al. [2] and Soewu et al. [63]. Plausible reasons for the over-representation of followers of Islam over Christians or African Traditionalists include firstly that most of the vendors hailed from the guinea savanna ecological zone, the largest of the ecozones with Islam-dominated populations. Also, the Ghana Statistical Service [36] reported that the northern region and then the largest region in the guinea savanna ecological zone had a population of 60.0% Muslims, 21.0% Christians and 16.0% Traditionalists. Assessment of the marital status of the vendors also indicated that up to three-quarters (75.2%) were married, a proportion lower than the 92.4% reported by [52]. This is not surprising since nine out of 10 vendors (89.8%) were above 30 years, an age at which most Ghanaians would have married. Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), Ghana Health Service (GHS) and ICF Macro [38] showed that the median age at first marriage was 19.8 years for women and 25.9 years for men. In terms of the location of the markets for animal-based medicines, this study found that less than a third of the vendors (26.5%) plied their trade in rural markets. It would then have been expected that there should be more patronage of animal parts in rural areas where access to modern health facilities and personnel remained a challenge, but the opposite was observed in this study. This could be attributed to the higher income levels of urban dwellers who could afford these animal parts, some of which are expensive. This assertion is corroborated by Thorsen and Pouliot [67] in Nepal.
The age distribution of vendors indicated that about a third (38.6%) of respondents were between the ages of 51 and 60 years. However, Nnamuka et al. [52] reported ages 41–50 years to be the modal age range while Ajagun et al. [2] found half (50%) of the vendors belonging to the 31–45 years age bracket. Soewu et al. [63] also indicated that most of the vendors of traditional medicine they surveyed were between the ages of 40 and 49 years. It is not too clear what might account for Ghana’s higher modal age. It can, however, be attributed to the current increasing interest in formal education in Ghana as a result of the introduction of a free secondary education policy of the government. The trade in animal-based traditional medicine has now been left in the hands of the aged which could lead to the loss of traditional knowledge when they pass on without transmitting it to the younger ones. Some vendors clearly indicated that their children who would have learned the trade have gone to school so they will have to continue even into old age.
Uses of animals for traditional medicine in Ghana
According to the vendors, their clients indicated they used the parts of the 75 animal species for medicinal, mystical and other purposes, similar to reports by Nieman et al. [51] in South Africa and Timothy et al. [68] in Nigeria. In the South African study [51], most of the animals were used for spiritual/magical purposes rather than medicinal similar to what Gbogbo and Daniels [35] reported in Ghana where 70% of the uses of these animals were for spiritual purposes. This is contrary to the findings of this study in which about three-fifths (59.1%) of the vendors said their clients were using the animals for medicinal purposes, while about a quarter (28.2%) intended to use these animal parts for mystical purposes. The differences in the proportions of various forms of use can be attributed to differences in the scope of the study. While the South African study was conducted among traditional healers in 17 townships and informal settlements in the rural and peri-urban landscapes in the Boland Region of the West Cape Province, the Ghanaian study was conducted among vendors of traditional medicine plying their trade in seven markets located in the Accra Metropolitan Area.
Forty-seven different types of diseases were reported to require the use of animal parts for treatment, with skin diseases being the most common, followed by epilepsy. Kebebew et al. [43] also reported skin-related diseases as the disorder most commonly treated with animal parts in Ethiopia. Respiratory diseases were listed by Haileselasie [40] and Alves et al. [10], while Yohannes and Chane [82] and Ajagun et al. [2] reported stomach pain and rheumatism, respectively, as disease conditions most commonly treated with animal parts. Although skin disorders are among the top 10 diseases reported at out-patient departments of health facilities in Ghana, malaria was the topmost disease [72]; therefore, it is not so clear why skin disorders were the main medical condition animal parts are used to treat in this study.
The spiritual importance of the animal parts among Ghanaian users had been shown in this study with 27 different mystical or spiritual uses indicated by the vendors. The African belief in the supernatural and the possibility of deriving goodness as well as harm from the spiritual realm may be a factor that may account for the patronage of these animal parts for mystical purposes [61]. Several studies [2, 20, 35, 47, 50, 59, 62, 68, 83] have reported various uses of animal parts for protection of self and property, boosting of businesses, charming of others and even improving crop yields in farms. This is not surprising considering how spiritually aware Africans are. It is, however, worth stating that the application of animal parts for mystical purposes is not only common among Africans since some other studies have reported the use of animal parts for non-medicinal purposes in some European countries such as Spain, Italy and Albania [17, 39, 58]. Similar reports of the use of animals for magical/spiritual conditions have been reported in Brazil [57, 66].
Local importance of traded animals
The local importance of each species for traditional medicine as measured by the relative frequency of citation (RFC) index (Tardio and Santayana 2008) indicated the top five most important animals traded by the vendors as chameleons (Chamaeleo spp.), lions (Panthera leo), elephants (Loxodonta africana), tigers (Panthera tigris) and West African crocodiles (Crocodylus suchus). Boakye et al. [21] in Ghana and D’Cruze et al. [28] in Togo had also reported the chameleon to be the most traded animal. Although Gbogbo and Daniels [35] reported the forest-hinged tortoise (Kinixys erosa) as the most traded animal in Accra, Ghana, the second most traded were chameleons. The versatility of chameleons in the management of both physical diseases and spiritual conditions, as well as their availability, accessibility and low prices, may account for their high RFC. For lions, tigers, elephants and crocodiles, the high RFC indicates their importance in traditional medicine in Ghana, possibly due to the possession of some attributes that users can relate to in their application in traditional medicine. For instance, lions are associated with bravery and strength and hence their use for mystical purposes that provide physical or spiritual fortitude. This study found the African savanna elephant, Loxodonta africana, and the West African crocodile, Crocodylus suchus to be used for the treatment of skin rashes and for protection against injury from bullets and sharp objects possibly due to their thick and tough skins. The top two most important taxonomic families by way of citation in this study were the Bovidae (domestic cattle, African buffalo, domestic sheep, etc.) and the Felidae (lion, tiger, leopard, etc.) unlike Accipitridae and Cercopithecidae [21] reported in Kumasi, Ghana or the Aganidae as indicated by Alade et al. [3] in Nigeria. The bravery and charismatic attributes of the top most traded members of the Felidae in this study make their trade and demand high. They play important roles in rituals associated with the provision of spiritual fortification and protection. An important component of African cultures is the drum used for entertainment, social and spiritually related events [12]. These drums are mainly carved from wood with their percussive surface made from animal skins, especially those from the Bovidae (cattle, goats, sheep) which may account for their high trade volumes in traditional medicine markets in Ghana [4, 12, 22].
Animals traded in Ghanaian traditional medicine markets
A total of 75 animal species from 11 classes were being sold by traditional medicine vendors in Ghana. These numbers are higher than those reported from several other places in Africa, Europe, Asia and the Americas [75], Quave et al. [5, 58], Alves and Alves, [9], Whiting et al. [77], Djagoun et al. [31], [18, 21, 35, 51, 82]. Quave et al. [58] reported a higher species number of 80 because the study was conducted in three European countries and Nepal, while Alves & Alves [9] had 584 species and 10 classes of animals from several countries in Latin America where the richest biomes are located. Djagoun et al. [31] in a nationwide study in the Republic of Benin also reported 87 mammals which is a number higher than similar studies conducted in Ghana. The plausible reason for the higher number of animal species traded for traditional medicine in the Republic of Benin than in Ghana could be because Benin has more than twice the number of followers of traditional religion (11.6%) than Ghana (5.0%); hence, there is a higher demand for more diverse types of animals [70, 71]. The study sites and their spread, the species richness of the specific geographical region and types of the respondents may account for differences between some previous studies and the numbers reported in this study. For studies that reported a lower number of species and classes, most of them were carried out among specific ethnic groups, or specific districts or communities and the study sites were communities not marketplaces as reported in this study.
Out of the 11 different animal classes being sold by the traditional medicine vendors in this study, more than half (49.3%) of the animals are mammals, followed by birds and reptiles, which is similar to that reported by Kendie et al. [44], Kebebew et al. [43], Boakye et al. [21] and Teixeira et al. [66]. However, reports by Yohannes and Chane [82], Whiting et al. [77] and Nieman et al., [51] found more reptiles than birds after mammals. Gbogbo and Daniels [35], however, reported more reptiles and birds than mammals in their study in markets in Accra. The differences could be attributed to the study sites and participants as well as the geographical coverage of the studies.
Distribution of animal species used for traditional medicine based on ecological zones
In West Africa, most animal species are found within and around tropical rainforests with the species richness generally decreasing as the savanna vegetation is encountered [29]. Also, according to Mensah et al. (2006) and Sinsin et al. (2008) as cited in Djagoun et al. [31], generally the abundance of animal species in their natural habitat leads to an increase in their numbers in the traditional medicine markets in that locality. The results of this study rather present a contrary situation since the Guinea savanna ecological zone reported the highest number of animal species in their traditional medicine market with the coastal savanna presenting the least with the difference not statistically significant (p-value = 0.1914). For animals that were specifically found in the various ecological zones, the northerly situated Guinea savanna has the highest of 11 compared to the 7 reported in the forest zone. These results show that in the case of Ghana, other factors besides the ecological location of the traditional medicine markets influence the animal species sold in them. For instance, moon snails (Natica monodi) and Sea urchins (Echinus spp.) are marine creatures, but they were reported only in the Guinea savanna ecozone. Also, the Common octopus (Octopus vulgaris), a marine animal was found only in the forest ecozone. The only Hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius) sanctuary in Ghana is located in Wechaiu in the Upper West region of Ghana which is in the Guinea savanna ecozone, but markets in the coastal savanna sold parts of this animal. This shows the availability of an animal species in the traditional medicine market is not determined by the abundance of that animal in a habitat. The possible factors that may account for the presence or absence of an animal species in a market may be a demand factor influenced by cultural beliefs. Although not reported here, more than half of the patrons of animal parts for traditional medicine were from the Mole-Dagbani ethnic group who inhabit the Guinea savanna ecozones in Ghana. Wholesalers were the main suppliers for more than half of these traders in animal parts. Furthermore, almost 90% of traders indicated they travel outside their localities and even to neighbouring countries such as Nigeria, Burkina Faso, Benin among others to purchase their animal parts and products.
Conservation implications
The international trade in wildlife, its parts and derivatives is estimated to be expanding in both volume and value terms. For each species, trade may have positive and negative consequences for conservation and the long-term survival of species and biological diversity [24]. In this study, 15.2% of all the animals traded are among the threatened species according to the IUCN Red List, with the proportion increasing to 40.0% among the top 10 traded species. Again, more than a quarter (28.8%) of the animals are experiencing a decreasing population trend but the rate is higher (52.5%) if those animals not listed or whose status remained unknown are excluded. A revelation of 60.0% of the top 10 traded animal species in this study experiencing a decreasing population trend is rather disturbing to conservationists. Although a majority (69.9%) of the animals being traded for traditional medicine in Ghana are not listed in CITES Appendices, there are conservation implications when the top 10 traded animals have 20.0% listed in Appendix I and even a greater proportion of 60% in Appendix II. Intra-country differences in the level of trade in threatened animal species can be seen in Ghana as the 14.7% recorded in this study was lower than the 19% recorded in Kumasi by Boakye et al. [21] but higher than the 13.0% indicated by Gbogbo and Daniels [35] in their Accra survey. These high proportions of threatened animals and internationally regulated animal species found in this study, clearly indicate that this unregulated trade and use of animals in traditional medicine has implications for the conservation of biodiversity. Even, the presence of the vulnerable lions and the endangered elephants in the top 10 should be of concern considering the roles they play in the ecosystem. Being predators of herbivores such as zebras and wildebeest, a reduction of the lion population as a result of high levels of trade in traditional medicine will affect the conditions of grasslands and forests and the ecosystem services they provide. A reduction in the population of elephants which are obligatory dispersers of several trees with large tough seed coats will affect the germination and development of such trees which will affect the biodiversity in such ecosystems [76].
Conclusion
The trade of animal parts and products for traditional medicine in Ghana is widespread, especially in market centres in the urban area. These animals are used mainly for medicinal purposes, especially skin diseases, but their use for mystical purposes is also prevalent. Again, with the topmost traded animals being those in CITES Appendices I and II, means there is some laxity in the enforcement of laws that are to ensure sustainable use of animal resources. Although a majority of animals traded for traditional medicine may not be currently of conservation concern and not listed under CITES, policymakers and other stakeholders in Ghana and beyond would have to start working on ensuring the survival of the threatened ones and prevent the sliding of the non-threatened species into extinction so the biodiversity will be conserved for the use of the future generation.
Availability of data and materials
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Abbreviations
- IUCN:
-
International Union for Conservation of Nature
- CITES:
-
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
- WHO:
-
World Health Organization
- IUCN/PACO:
-
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Central and West Africa Programme (PACO)
- RFC:
-
Relative frequency of citation
- SPSS:
-
Statistical package for the social sciences
- C:
-
Coastal savanna ecozone
- F:
-
Forest ecozone
- T:
-
Transitional ecozone
- G:
-
Guinea savanna ecozone
- ABM:
-
Animal-based medicine
References
Adeola MO. Importance of wild animals and their parts in the culture, religious festivals, and traditional medicine, of Nigeria. Environ Conserv. 1992;19(2):125–34.
Ajagun EJ, Anyaku CE, Afolayan MP. A survey of the traditional medical and non-medical uses of animals species and parts of the indigenous People of Ogbomoso. Oyo State Int J Herbal Med. 2007;5(3):26–32.
Alade GO, Frank A, Ajibesin KK. Animals and animal products as medicines: a survey of Epie-Atissa and Ogbia people of Bayelsa State, Nigeria. J Pharm Pharmacogn Res. 2018;6:483–502.
Aldridge, C. Materials used to make African drums (2023). https://www.ehow.co.uk/list_6621778_materials-used-make-african-drums.html
Alonso-Castro AJ, Carranza-Álvarez C, Maldonado-Miranda JJ, del Rosario Jacobo-Salcedo M, Quezada-Rivera DA, Lorenzo-Márquez H, Medellín-Milán P. Zootherapeutic practices in Aquismón, San Luis Potosí, México. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;138(1):233–7.
Alves RRN, Souto WMS. Ethnozoology: a brief introduction. Ethnobiol Conserv. 2015;4:1–13.
Alves RRN, Rosa IL, Albuquerque UP, Cunningham AB. Medicine from the wild: an overview of the use and trade of animal products in traditional medicines. Anim Tradit Folk Med Implic Conserv. 2013; 25–42.
Alves RR, Lima HN, Tavares MC, Souto WM, Barboza RR, Vasconcellos A. Animal-based remedies as complementary medicines in Santa Cruz do Capibaribe, Brazil. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2008;8(1):44.
Alves R, Alves HN. The faunal drugstore: animal-based remedies used in traditional medicines in Latin America. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011;7(1):1–43.
Alves R, Barbosa JA, Santos SL, Souto W, Barboza RR. Animal-based remedies as complementary medicines in the semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med. 2011;2011:179876.
Anderson EN, Pearsall D, Hunn E, Turner N, editors. Ethnobiology. Hoboken: Wiley; 2012.
Anku W. Drumming among the Akan and Anlo Ewe of Ghana: an introduction. Afr Music J Int Libr Afr Music. 2009;8(3):38–64.
Attuquayefio DK, Fobil JN. An overview of biodiversity conservation in Ghana: challenges and prospects. West Afr J Appl Ecol. 2005;7(1):1–18.
Awoyemi S, Botha A, Chandra S, Citegetse G, Dabone C, Deikumah J, Safford R. West African vulture persecution threat analysis report: literature review and threat mapping 2022. https://www.cms.int/sites/default/files/publication/West%20African%20vulture%20threat%20analysis_Final_04.10.22.pdf
Awumbila M, Manuh T, Quartey P, Tagoe CA, Bosiakoh TA. Migration country paper (Ghana). Legon: Centre for Migration Studies, University of Ghana,; 2008.
AZ Animal Staff. Animals in Ghana 2023. https://a-z-animals.com/animals/location/africa/ghana/
Benitez G. Animals used for medicinal and magico-religious purposes in western Granada Province, Andalusia (Spain). J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;137(3):1113–23.
Betlloch Mas I, Chiner E, Chiner Betlloch J, Llorca FX, Martín Pascual L. The use of animals in medicine of Latin tradition: study of the Tresor de Beutat, a medieval treatise devoted to female cosmetics. Photon. 2014;121:752–60.
Boakye MK, Pietersen DW, Kotzé A, Dalton DL, Jansen R. Knowledge and uses of African pangolins as a source of traditional medicine in Ghana. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(1):e0117199.
Boakye MK, Pietersen DW, Kotzé A, Dalton DL, Jansen R. Ethnomedicinal use of African pangolins by traditional medical practitioners in Sierra Leone. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014;10(1):1–10.
Boakye MK, Wiafe ED, Ziekah MY. Ethnomedicinal use of pythons by traditional medicine practitioners in Ghana. Afr J Herpetol. 2021;70(2):155–65.
Bokor MJ. When the drum speaks: the rhetoric of motion, emotion, and action in African societies. Rhetorica J Hist Rhetoric. 2014;32(2):165–94.
Boyer AG, Jetz W. Extinctions and the loss of ecological function in island bird communities. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2014;23(6):679–88.
Cooney R, Kasterine A, MacMillan D, Milledge SA, Nossal K, Roe D, John’t Sas-Rolfes M,. The trade in wildlife: a framework to improve biodiversity and livelihood outcomes. Geneva: International Trade Centre; 2015. p. 46.
Costa-Neto EM, Motta PC. Animal species traded as ethnomedicinal resources in the Federal District, central west region of Brazil. Open Complement Med J. 2010;2:24–30.
Daboné C, Ouédraogo I, Ouéda A, Thompson LJ, Weesie PD. Hooded Vultures Necrosyrtes monachus are still declining in West Africa: a nearly 50-year assessment study (1969–2019). Ostrich. 2024;95(1):21–31.
David Shepherd Wildlife Foundation. Threat to Tigers; 2024. https://davidshepherd.org/species/tigers/threats/
D’Cruze N, Assou D, Coulthard E, Norrey J, Megson D, Macdonald DW, Auliya M. Snake oil and pangolin scales: insights into wild animal use at “Marché des Fétiches” traditional medicine market. Togo Nat Conserv. 2020;39:45–71.
de Bie S. Wildlife resources of the West African savanna. Wageningen: Wageningen University and Research; 1991.
Deikumah JP. Vulture declines, threats and conservation: the attitude of the indigenous Ghanaian. Bird Conserv Int. 2020;30(1):103–16.
Djagoun CA, Akpona HA, Mensah GA, Nuttman C, Sinsin B. Wild mammals trade for zootherapeutic and mythic purposes in Benin (West Africa): Capitalizing species involved, provision sources, and implications for conservation. In: Animals in Traditional Folk Medicine. Springer, Berlin; 2013. pp. 367–381.
Dove N. A return to traditional health care practices: a Ghanaian study. J Black Stud. 2010;40(5):823–34.
Fabrega H. Earliest phases in the evolution of sickness and healing. Med Anthropol Q. 1997;11(1):26–55.
Fabricant DS, Farnsworth NR. The value of plants used in traditional medicine for drug discovery. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109(Suppl 1):69.
Gbogbo F, Daniels JK. Trade in wildlife for traditional medicine in Ghana: therapeutic values, zoonoses considerations, and implications for biodiversity conservation. Hum Dimens Wildl. 2019;24(3):296–300.
Ghana Statistical Service. 2010 Population and Housing Census. Regional Analytic Report—Northern Region; 2013. https://www2.statsghana.gov.gh/docfiles/2010phc/2010_PHC_Regional_Analytical_Reports_Northern_Region.pdf.
Ghana Statistical Service. Ghana 2021 Population and Housing Census. Preliminary report, Volume 1; 2021.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), Ghana Health Service (GHS), and ICF Macro. Ghana Demographic and Health Survey 2008: Key Findings. Calverton, Maryland, USA: GSS, GHS, and ICF Macro; 2009.
González JA, Vallejo JR. The use of domestic animals and their derivative products in contemporary Spanish ethnoveterinary medicine. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021;271:113900.
Haileselasie TH. Traditional zootherapeutic studies in Degu’a Tembien, Northern Ethiopia. Curr Res J Biol Sci. 2012;4(5):563–9.
Herbert DG, Hamer ML, Mander M, Mkhize N, Prins F. Invertebrate animals as a component of the traditional medicine trade in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Afr Invertebrates. 2003;44(2):1–18.
IUCN/PACO. Parks and reserves of Ghana: management effectiveness assessment of protected areas; 2010. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2010-073.pdf.
Kebebew M, Mohamed E, Meyer-Rochow VB. Knowledge and use of traditional medicinal animals in the Arba Minch Zuriya district, Gamo zone, Southern Ethiopia. Eur J Therapeut. 2021;27(2):158–67.
Kendie FA, Mekuriaw SA, Dagnew MA. Ethnozoological study of traditional medicinal appreciation of animals and their products among the indigenous people of Metema Woreda, North-Western Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018;14(1):37.
Kingdon J, Largen MJ. The kingdom field guide to African mammals. Zool J Linn Soc. 1997;120(4):479.
Klutse NAB, Owusu K, Adukpo DC, Nkrumah F, Quagraine K. Farmer’s observation on climate change impacts on maize (Zea mays) production in a selected agroecological zone in Ghana. Res J Agricult Environ Manag. 2013;2(12):394–402.
Lawal OA, Banjo AD. Survey for the usage of arthropods in traditional medicine in southwestern Nigeria. J Entomol. 2007;4(2):104–12.
Lev E. Traditional healing with animals (zootherapy): medieval to present-day Levantine practice. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003;85(1):107–18.
Li WF, Jiang JG, Chen J. Chinese medicine and its modernization demand. Arch Med Res. 2008;39(2):246–51.
Mashele NM, Thompson LJ, Downs CT. Uses of vultures in traditional medicines in the Kruger to Canyons Biosphere Region, South Africa. J Raptor Res. 2021;55(3):328–39.
Nieman WA, Leslie AJ, Wilkinson A. Traditional medicinal animal use by Xhosa and Sotho communities in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2019;15(1):1–14.
Nnamuka SS, Soewu DA, Akinsorotan OA. Conservation status of traded wild fauna for traditional medicine in Osun state, Nigeria. UNILAG J Med Sci Technol. 2020;8(1):94–110.
Nowell K. Far from a cure: the tiger trade revisited; 2000. https://www.changewildlifeconsumers.org/site/assets/files/1104/far_from_cure.pdf
Ntiamoa-Baidu Y. Wildlife and food security in Africa, vol. 33. Rome: Food & Agriculture Org; 1997.
Ogada D, Shaw P, Beyers RL, Buij R, Murn C, Thiollay JM, Sinclair AR. Another continental vulture crisis: Africa’s vultures collapsing toward extinction. Conserv Lett. 2016;9(2):89–97.
Payyappallimana U. Role of traditional medicine in primary health care: an overview of perspectives and challenging. Yokohama J Soc Sci. 2010;14(6):57–77.
Pereira LF, Silveira RB, da Silva AG, Freitas MO, Abilhoa V. Medicinal and mystical-religious uses of seahorses in Southern Brazilian coast. Biodiversidade. 2021;20(4):168–76.
Quave CL, Lohani U, Verde A, Fajardo J, Rivera D, Obón C, Pieroni A. A comparative assessment of zootherapeutic remedies from selected areas in Albania, Italy, Spain, and Nepal. J Ethnobiol. 2010;30(1):92.
Setlalekgomo MR. Ethnozoological survey of the indigenous knowledge on the use of pangolins (Manis sps) in traditional medicine in Lentsweletau Extended Area in Botswana. J Anim Sci Adv. 2014;4(6):883–90.
Simelane TS, Kerley GIH. Conservation implications of the use of vertebrates by Xhosa traditional healers in South Africa. S Afr J Wildl Res-24-Mon Delayed Open Access. 1998;28(4):121–6.
Singh C, Bhagwan R. African spirituality: unearthing beliefs and practices for the helping professions. Soc Work. 2020;56(4):403–15.
Soewu DA, Adekanola TA. Traditional-medical knowledge and perception of pangolins (Manis sps) among the Awori people, Southwestern Nigeria. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011;7(1):1–11.
Soewu DA, Bakare OK, Ayodele IA. Trade in wild mammalian species for traditional medicine in Ogun State, Nigeria. Glob J Med Res. 2012;12(3):6–22.
Takahashi K, Azuma Y, Shimada K, Saito T, Kawase M, Schaffer SW. Quality and safety issues related to traditional animal medicine: role of taurine. J Biomed Sci. 2010;17(1):S44.
Tardío J, Pardo-de-Santayana M. Cultural importance indices: a comparative analysis based on the useful wild plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain) 1. Econ Bot. 2008;62(1):24–39.
Teixeira JVDS, Santos JSD, Guanaes DHA, Rocha WDD, Schiavetti A. Uses of wild vertebrates in traditional medicine by farmers in the region surrounding the Serra do Conduru State Park (Bahia, Brazil). Biota Neotrop. 2020;20:e20190793.
Thorsen RS, Pouliot M. Traditional medicine for the rich and knowledgeable: challenging assumptions about treatment-seeking behaviour in rural and peri-urban Nepal. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31(3):314–24.
Timothy SK, Habib DU, Ayodeji AE. Survey of zoological materials used in traditional medicine in Sabon Gari and Zaria Local Government Areas, Kaduna State, Nigeria. J Complement Med Res. 2018;8(1):32–9.
Trape JF, Trape S, Chirio L. Lézards, crocodiles et tortues d’Afrique occidentale et du Sahara. IRD éditions; 2012.
United States Department of State. Benin 2020 International Religious Freedom Report; 2020a. https://bj.usembassy.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/162/240282-BENIN-2020-INTERNATIONAL-RELIGIOUS-FREEDOM-REPORT.pdf
United States Department of State. Ghana 2020 International Religious Freedom Report; 2020b. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/240282-GHANA-2020-INTERNATIONAL-RELIGIOUS-FREEDOM-REPORT.pdf
University of Ghana. University of Ghana School of Public Health State of the Nation’s Health Report 2018; 2018. https://publichealth.ug.edu.gh/sites/publichealth.ug.edu.gh/files/docs/state_of_the_nations_interior_final_compressed-compressed_2.pdf
Valiente-Banuet A, Aizen MA, Alcántara JM, Arroyo J, Cocucci A, Galetti M, Medel R. Beyond species loss: the extinction of ecological interactions in a changing world. Funct Ecol. 2015;29(3):299–307.
Van Andel T, Carvalheiro LG. Why urban citizens in developing countries use traditional medicines: the case of Suriname. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med. 2013;2013:687197.
Vyas N, Mahawar MM, Jaroli DP. Traditional medicines derived from domestic animals used by Rebari community of Rajasthan, India. Our Nat. 2009;7(1):129–38.
Western D. The ecological role of elephants in Africa. Pachyderm. 1989;12:42.
Whiting MJ, Williams VL, Hibbitts TJ. Animals traded for traditional medicine at the Faraday market in South Africa: species diversity and conservation implications. In: Animals in traditional folk medicine. Springer, Berlin; 2013, pp. 421–473.
Wongnaa CA, Awunyo-Vitor D. Scale efficiency of maize farmers in four agroecological zones of Ghana: a parametric approach. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2019;18(3):275–87.
World Health Organization, Africa. The African Health Monitor—31st August, African Traditional Medicine Day; 2010. https://www.afro.who.int/sites/default/files/2017-06/ahm-special-issue-14.pdf
World Health Organization, Traditional Medicine Strategy 2002–2005, WHO, Rome, Italy; 2002. http://www.wpro.who.int/health_technology/book_who_traditional_medicine_strategy_2002_2005.pdf
Wright C. The impact of traditional and folk medicine on biodiversity. Sci Soc Rev. 2012;2012:25–7.
Yohannes DW, Chane M. Ethnozoological study of traditional medicinal animals used by the Kore people in Amaro Woreda, Southern Ethiopia. Int J Mol Evol Biodivers. 2014; 4(2):1–8.
Zanvo S, Djagoun SC, Azihou FA, Djossa B, Sinsin B, Gaubert P. Ethnozoological and commercial drivers of the pangolin trade in Benin. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2021;17(1):1–11.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge Mr. Stephen Dunia Tamanja and Dr. Kwabena Gyebi both officials of the Accra Zoo who assisted with the identification of some of the animals. Others who assisted with sample identification were s Mr. Yahaya Musah of the Department of Animal Biology and Conservation Sciences and Dr. Andrews Agyekumhene of the Department of Marine and Fisheries Sciences, University of Ghana.
Funding
Although most of the funding was from personal resources, BANGA-Africa provided a thesis completion grant to the corresponding author during his final year of PhD studies at the University of Ghana.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
E.P.K.A. conceived the idea, drafted the study tool, collected and analysed the data, and wrote the manuscript. D.K.A., F.G., J.A.S. and BYO supervised the research work and wrote the manuscript. S.G. and E.A. also wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Ethical clearance with certificate number ECBAS 011/20–21 was provided by the Ethics Committee for Basic and Applied Science of the University of Ghana.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ameade, E.P.K., Attuquayefio, D.K., Gbogbo, F. et al. Animals traded for traditional medicine in Ghana: their zootherapeutic uses and implications for biodiversity conservation. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 21, 21 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13002-024-00717-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13002-024-00717-5