Skip to main content

Diversity, management, and uses of edible plants in a Ñäñho community of Southern Querétaro, Mexico

Abstract

Background

Mexico is one of the countries with the highest cultural, biological, and agrobiological diversity. However, an accelerated process of ancestral knowledge loss, related to the management of agrobiodiversity, native seeds, and other edible plant species management is affecting food sovereignty. This process of knowledge loss was documented at the Ñäñho region, of southern Querétaro, where our study took place. Our objective was to document the diversity of edible plant diversity, management, and use as well as the agroecosystems from which they are obtained.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted over 2 years (2021–2023) with 50 informants selected through a snowball sampling. Informal interviews and participant observations were also used with these and other people from the same community. Herbarium specimens and seed accessions were collected and photographed.

Results

In total, 119 edible plant species were identified. The richest families were Solanaceae, Rosaceae, Cactaceae, and Asteraceae. The edible species occur in 11 agroecosystems with 58.6% of the species native to Mexico, and 41.4% introduced. The orchard, rustic greenhouse, house “milpa,” mountain hill, and backyard, have the highest species diversity. The main management types were sowing and gathering plants. Eighty-five plant names were recorded in the Hñäñho language. The plant parts used were fruits (60.5%) and stems (46.2%). The gastronomic categories with the highest species percentage were stews, beverages, and refreshments, while the highest species number used in the gastronomic categories were cacti stalks or “nopales” (Opuntia spp.), maize (Zea mays), and amaranth (Amaranthus spp.).

Conclusions

The records in Southern Querétaro of edible plants and agroecosystems diversity were high. The plants, local knowledge documentation, and species management provide the basis for promoting projects focused on the Ñäñho biocultural wealth. Efforts are needed to encourage the least represented regional species. Community development programs are needed for food security and sovereignty; these are based on the local biocultural resources.

Background

Mexico is among the countries with the greatest cultural, biological, and agrobiological diversity [1], an essential part of the people biocultural heritage, who manage it through a variety of dietetic uses. An important number of edible species can be listed for several human groups. However, the importance of agrobiodiversity as the basis of gastronomic diversity is recognized when the consumption diversity and the preparation methods are taken in account. Agrobiodiversity generates cultural wealth and vice versa [2].

Many human societies share more or less homogeneous landscapes with similar agrobiodiversity. However, “they can manage to build very different gastronomies by applying religious, ideological, worldview aspects and intellectual filters to the food, with which they manage to effectively differentiate themselves from the others” [3]. Also, agrobiodiversity is threatened by various factors such as climate change, biodiversity loss and alteration (including domesticated species and varieties), ecosystems degradation, social and economic inequality, territorial conflicts, migration, and aging of the farmer population [4].

Regional agrobiodiversity is safeguarded in different environments and managed by the people, which allow different domestication degrees among the plant species used by the community. Among the indigenous agricultural systems (agroecosystems) of Mexico, at least three different spaces (cultural landscapes) of plant domestication and management are important: the managed natural vegetation, the milpa (traditional Mesoamerican polyculture of maize, beans, and squash, associated with other species), the agroforestry systems associated to milpas and home gardens [5, 6].

A wide range of management practices are applied to plant species. These include gathered or collection, toleration, promotion or enhancing (deliberate propagation of some plants), and protection, as well as the propagation of wild plants by transplanting whole individuals or dispersing sexual and/or vegetative propagules (sowing) [7].

More than 2,000 edible plant species have been registered in Mexico [8]. From these, 29 species, especially “quelites” (edible wild greens), have been listed as priority taxa for their conservation and sustainable use [9]. For the indigenous Otomí (“Ñäñho”) indigenous territory, a recent study described the “quelites” species richness and its cultural importance in the community of San Pedro Arriba, Temoaya, in the State of Mexico [10]. The authors found 64 species recorded as “quelites.”

For the state of Querétaro, a study on wild edible plants uses in La Barreta, municipality of Querétaro documented 47 edible species from 21 families [11]. They listed six gastronomic categories mentioned by the interviewees: snacks (16 species), fruits (15), “quelites” (11), desserts (8), sauces and condiments (7), and beverages (4).

In the municipality of Amealco, Querétaro, studies related to agricultural production have focused mainly on maize productivity and social cycles [12]. They were conducted at the Santiago Mexquititlan and San Ildefonso Tultepec regions, recognized as predominatly indigenous communities [13]. The study found that 53% of useful plants in both regions useful plants are edible, of which 43% of the Ñäñho plant species used as wild, 32% cultivated in the “milpa,” gardens or yards, and 25% are allochthonous (purchased in markets).

Studies on native and naturalized seeds in Amealco have described formal and informal seed systems [14]. More than 90% of the farmers use native seeds in rainfed agriculture, using primarily three local maize races such as Chalqueño, Cónicos, and Elotes Cónicos, and secondarily six races, Celaya, Cacahuacintle, Palomero Toluqueño, Elotes Occidentales, and Ancho [15, 16].

In San Miguel Tlaxcaltepec (SMT), the study site of the present work, maize is the main Ñäñho dietary supplement and is produced in the “milpa” with ancestral native seed cultivars [17]. In the “ejido” collective lands property plots, the commercial white maize seed is planted using agrochemicals, fertilizers, and herbicides [18].

The ancestral agrobiodiversity management knowledge in Amealco is rapidly decreasing. This process has been also documented in other Mexican regions [6]. The process is strongly influenced by the Hñäñho indigenous language erosion and their dietary patterns changes [13]. However, Amealco is still a very important biocultural region, since 42% of the state’s native people live there [19].

In Amealco, there is a significant loss of the traditional food, native seeds, and milpa agrobiodiversity components. This is due to changes in rainfall patterns and the use of agrochemicals [17]. However, several social, ecological, technological, economic, and cultural factors surely have certainly also had an impact.

The situation possesses a threat to the self-sufficiency, food security, and sovereignty in the community, as well as to the local nutritious food availability [20, 21]. It is therefore important to document the local knowledge about food resources and their role in nutrition. The objective of this study is to document the edible plants and the agroecosystems where they are obtained, their management type, the local names, the plant parts used, forms, and consumption categories in SMT, Amealco, Querétaro, Mexico.

Methods

Study area

The municipality of Amealco is located in southern Queretaro in the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt [22]. The area is characterized by mountain ranges interspersed with valleys. The elevation varies between 2000 and 3300 m. The agroecosystems include rainfed (46%) and irrigation agriculture (3.9%). The vegetation types are oak forest (9.8%), pine forest (4.6%), oak-pine forest (3.5%), chaparral (0.6%), subtropical scrub (0.2%), desert scrub (0.001%), induced grassland (11.29%), natural grassland (9.6%), unvegetated areas (3.9%), urban areas (5.8%), and wetlands (0.8%) [19]. Despite its cultural and biological diversity, Amealco is considered by CONEVAL (National Council for the Evaluation of Development) as one of the ten state municipalities where 25–50% of the population has difficulty obtaining food [23].

The SMT community is located in the southwestern part of Amealco (Fig. 1), bordering the states of Mexico and Michoacán. It is one of the six municipality demographic microregions, and half of its population suffers from some degree of poverty and is a highly marginalized microregion [24]. The SMT barrios are La Cruz, La Ladera, El Pueblito, El Lindero, Agua Buena, Ojo de Agua, El Barco, El Picacho, Los Árboles, and El Terrero. The SMT ejido, according to the Registro Agrario Nacional (National Agrarian Registry), covers 3225.32 hectares with 471 “ejidatarios,” making it the largest ejido in the Amealco municipality [18].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of the indigenous communities in the municipality of Amealco, southern Querétaro, bordering to the states of México and Michoacán. In black the SMT community, surrounded by its “barrios.”

Diversity of edible plants in agroecosystems

To compile the list of edible plants with their names and growing areas, we interviewed 25 men and 25 women. The interviewees age ranged from 23 to 97 years old, but most were over 60. They lived in the barrios of La Cruz, El Pueblito, El Picacho, El Potrero, El Barco, Barrio Centro, Chitejé de Garabato, El Varal, Cerro del Gallo, and Las Salvas (Fig. 3). Participants were selected using the snowball sampling technique [25]. We started with the members of the Organizing Committee of the Native Corn and “milpa” Fair. Semistructured interviews were carried out to identify the recorded plants local names, uses, and management. Nine Ñäñho language speakers collaborated in the interviews with help of a translator, Diego Ugalde de Haene, who is a native language professor in the community. These collaborators are recognized by the community for their knowledge of edible plants, and with their help, the plant recorded names were transcribed [13, 26].

Botanical specimens were collected in the natural vegetation and the agroecosystems mentioned by the interviewees [27]. The APG IV plant classification system was used, and the scientific names were verified in Tropicos (tropicos.org) [28] and Plants of the World (powo.science.kew.org) [29]. The specimens were deposited in the QMEX Herbarium of the Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro. In addition, cultivated species seeds such as maize, beans, squash, and some “quelites,” were collected for the UAQ germplasm bank, following the methodology of Rao et al. [30].

Management and use of food plants

The semi-structured interviews conducted included questions about environmental modifications carried out by people in the area. Comprising practices are fertilization, moisture regulation, light incidence, temperature, competitors management, predators, pollinators, and dispersers management [5, 7]. To complement this information, participant observations were made in the community for two years. Most of the edible plant information was obtained through informal meetings and participant observations at the study area. For this, we create a database with all the information about the management details of uses, such as plants structures consumed and food processes. We analyze the data-making pivot tables in excel to obtain species and uses percentages.

Results

Edible plant diversity

We found a total of 820 edible plants records for 119 species belonging to 82 genera and 41 families from 11 agroecosystems in the community (Appendix). The most diverse genera are Opuntia (seven species), Prunus (five), and Solanum (five). The families more represented are Solanaceae (13 species, 11%), Rosaceae (11, 9.2%), Cactaceae (eight, 6.7%), and Asteraceae (seven, 5.9%) (Fig. 2). Nearly 60% of the species used in the community are native to Mexico, and ca. 40% were introduced but culturally assimilated since they arrived with the Spaniards from the sixteenth century, due to their gastronomic importance (Table 1). Unfortunately we found no records for the species introduction to the Ñäñho communities.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Edible plant species by family. In addition to those shown in the figure, 18 families had only one edible species (see the species list in the Appendix)

Table 1 Origin of the edible plants in the biocultural landscape of San Miguel Tlaxcaltepec, Amealco, Querétaro

During the interviews and tours, 196 herbarium specimens and 188 seed accessions were collected and photographed.

Plant names in the Ñäñho language

From the 820 records, a list was compiled of 270 common names in Spanish and Hñäñho was compiled. Since most of the speakers were over 60 years old (Fig. 3), when asked for the specific names of the plants, many mentioned that they knew them many years ago, but because they do not have anyone to practice their language with, they have forgotten them. The corresponding names of some plants are provided in the Appendix.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Interviews with the people of San Miguel Tlaxcaltepec

Agroecosystems scenarios of the food plants origin

People obtain their edible plants from 11 agroecosystems: stream banks, mountain hills, orchards, rustic greenhouses, plains or pastures, springs or wells, home “milpa,” ejidal “milpa,” nopaleras” (group of Opuntia spp. individuals), plots around the dam, and backyards or gardens (Fig. 4 and Table 2). Some species occur in more than one agroecosystem (Fig. 5). Most species are found in the orchard (14 spp.), the rustic greenhouse (13), the home “milpa” (12), and the mountain hill (11). This includes those that occurred only in each specific agroecosystem.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Agroecosystems for the edible plant species in the community of San Miguel Tlaxcaltepec, Amealco, Queretaro. a Stream bank (“bancos de arroyo”), b mountain hill (“cerro”), c orchard (“huerto”), d rustic greenhouse (“invernadero rústico”), e plain/pasture (“llano”), f spring or well (“manantial/pozo”), g and h house “milpa” (“milpa de casa”), i ejido “milpa” (“milpa de ejido”), j group of prickly pear cactus, Opuntia spp. (“nopalera), k backyard (“traspatio”), and l plots around the dam (“parcelas de la presa”)

Table 2 General characteristics of the 11 agroecosystems (alphabetical order) mentioned by the respondents
Fig. 5
figure 5

Number of edible plant species identified by agroecosystem (B = Backyard, D = Dam plots, EM = Ejidal “milpa,” G = Greenhouse, H = Mountain hill, HM = Home “milpa,” N = “Nopaleras,” O = Orchard, P = Plain). In addition to what is shown in the graph, there are two agroecosystems (stream bank and “nopaleras”), and 11 combinations of agroecosystems with only one species recorded

Edible plant management

The management categories for the edible plant species are (a) gathered or collected, (b) tolerated, (c) promoted, (d) transplanted, and (e) sown or planted (Table 3). The gathered category had 31 species, but when we consider the species gathered also in another category, the number increases to 57 species (49% of the total). This is because some species are managed in more than one way. The agroecosystems with the highest number of gathered plants are the hill, the home “milpa,” and the backyard (Fig. 6).

Table 3 Managed edible plant species in SMT, based on the classification of management types proposed by Casas et al. [5]
Fig. 6
figure 6

Number of sowed or planted edible plant species managed by agroecosystem (B = Backyard, D = Dam plots, EM = Ejidal “milpa,” G = Greenhouse, H = Mountain hill, HM = Home “milpa,” N = “Nopaleras,” O = Orchard). In addition to the graph, seven combinations of agroecosystems have just one species

The management type "sown or planted" was the most common with 58 species (49% of the total). However, when another type of management is present in addition to seeding or planting, the number increases to 67 species, or 56% of the total. The greenhouse, the orchard, and the backyard are the biocultural landscapes where the highest number of edible plant species is sown or planted (Fig. 6).

The management types of analysis, based on the origin of the edible species, show that among the native species, 38.6% are exclusively gathered or collected. However, for those collected and managed in another way, the percentage increases to 67.2% (Table 3). The sown or planted species represent 81.3% of the introduced species, while the gathered species (6.3%), and other managed types have lower percentages (Table 3).

Consumed parts of the edible plants

Fruits are the most consumed plant part (72 spp., 60.5%), followed by stems, including modified stems such as the potato tubers (55, 46.2%), then flowers, (43 spp., 36.1%), and leaves (41 spp., 34.5%). Smaller percentages correspond to roots (six spp., 5%), stem sap (six spp., 5%), and flower nectar (two spp., 1.7%) (Fig. 7). The total percentage of consumed parts exceeds 100% because different parts of some species are used at the same time, e.g., in the “laurel” (Litsea glaucescens Kunth) and some “quelites,” where the entire aerial part is used (leaves, stems, flowers, and seeds). “Quelites” are eaten before flowering for a better taste and texture. This is also true for the two nectar species, the “trompetilla” (Bouvardia terniflora (Cav.) Schltdl.) and the “espinosilla” (Loeselia Mexicana (Lam.) Brand), which grow as ruderals and are most commonly consumed during walks and fieldwork. In both species, a portion of the entire corolla is consumed when extracting the nectar. Another example is the “dalia” (Dahlia coccinea Cav.), and its tuber or “jicama” (root) is eaten, but petals were sometimes added to increase the volume of corn dough for “tortillas” or provide color.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Percentages of the consumed parts of the 119 edible plant species recorded in the community of SMT

Multiple part plans used on the same species were recorded. Then, 55 species (46.2%) of the species had only one part used, 30 (25.2%) provided two useful parts, 22 (18.5%) three parts, and 11 species (9.2%) four parts (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Number (percentage) of the consumed plant structures

Gastronomic categories and consumption forms

The consumption categories and forms mentioned by the informants, as well as the percentages based on the species numbers, are shown in Fig. 9. The highest percentages were stews, followed by beverages, snacks, and fruits. In addition, the gastronomic categories with the greatest diversity are “nopales” (Opuntia spp.), corn (Zea mays L.), and amaranth (Amaranthus spp.).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Some of the species consumed raw as a snack during working days in the fields or mountain hills. a Oak gall or "panchihuas" or "lulitos" (Quercus spp.), b colibrí flower or “espinocilla” (Loeselia mexicana), c prickly pears of "nopal bondó" (Opuntia robusta), d prickly pear of "nopal chamacuero" (Opuntia tomentosa), e white prickly pears (Opuntia sp.) and "tuna hartona" (O. streptacantha)

Snacks

This category refers to plants generally eaten raw during daily walks or during fieldwork. It is important to note that this category includes the consumption of four parts of the plant in different species such as roots, flowers (petals), and nectar, as well as specialized structures such as some oaks galls or "panchihuas" (Quercus spp.) (Fig. 9).

The “mountain dalias" (Dahlia coccinea) tuberous roots are called "jícamas" and are eaten as soon as they have been dug up, and removing the outer skin, called "cascarita." The water they contain is sucked, and the pulp is squeezed out, similar to the way juice is extracted from maize stalks. The long narrow roots of the "jícama de puerco" (Cologania angustifolia Kunth) and the "jicamita" (Macroptilium gibbosifolium (Ortega) A. Delgado) are consumed the same way. The raw consumption of a species called "liendre" has been recorded. It has small underground bulbs that resemble tiny coconuts called “cocomites.” We were not able to identify the plant, but because of the bulbs name, it is possibly a species of the genus Tigridia.

Other species in this category are two that are consumed for the flower nectar because they are "sweet" (Bouvardia terniflora and Loeselia mexicana). The "panchihuas" or "lulitos" (oak trees galls from the branches and leaves) are eaten raw but must be "green," or unripe to be edible. In this state, they have an apple-like flavor.

Although some tree species such as the “capulin” (Prunus serotina Ehrh.) and the “tejocote” (Crataegus mexicana DC.) are also eaten as snacks, they are included in the fruit category. The same applies to the "talayotes" or "puerquitos" (Matelea pedulculata (Decne.)), which grow in the plains. They can be eaten raw as a snack only if they are unripe. Otherwise, they need to be fried or roasted before consumption.

For prickly pears (tunas”) it is important to know how to pick them without getting pricked by the thorns. Some “tunas” are sweeter than others. Also, some produce more seeds, some have more water, and some taste sour, but all the “tunas” from any “nopal” are edible and appreciated. Seven species of the genus Opuntia were recorded, six of which have edible fruits consumed as snacks: O. lasiacantha Pfeiff., O. robusta H.L.Wendl. ex Pfeiff, O. tomentosa Salm-Dyck, O. hyptiacantha F.A.C. Weber, O. streptacantha Lem., and O. joconostle F.A.C. Weber ex Diguet (Fig. 9). The last species, known as "coconoxtle," is found in the hills where people collect firewood. The fruit is usually eaten with added salt.

Beverages

Two traditional fermented beverages recorded in the region are in danger of disappearing, because few people know how to prepare them: “colonche” and “sendichó or senditó.” The former is made with the prickly pear variety known as "sangre de toro" (Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill.), which was found in the backyard of one of the interviewees but not elsewhere. The latter is a fermented maize beverage made from sprouted seeds and consumed during feasts and celebrations.

The daily use of infusions for pleasure in the absence of illness was recorded. These include the consumption of eight species: "muicle" or "muitle" (Justicia spicigera Schltdl.), elderflower (Sambucus mexicana C.Presl ex DC.), “pericón” (Tagetes lucida Cav.), “anís de monte” (Tagetes filifolia Lag.), “tejocote” (Crataegus mexicana-), “naranjo” (Citrus × aurantium f. aurantium), “ortiga” (Urtica sp.), “cedrón” (Aloysia citrodora Paláu), and "tlachicote" or mountain tea (Clinopodium macrostemum (Moc. & Sessé ex Benth.) Kuntze). The latter was used as a morning decoction before coffee and became popular in the community. Another interesting beverage is the "granada de guía" or "platanito" (Passiflora tripartita (Juss.) Poir.), whose fruit is sometimes eaten raw, but because of its sour taste, it is preferably consumed in fresh water with a little sugar (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10
figure 10

On the left, herbarium specimen of "tlachicote" or mountain tea (Clinopodium macrostemum) collected in a backyard from an original plant found on a mountain hill in the neighborhood of Ojo de Agua, San Miguel Tlaxcaltepec. On the right, "granada de guía" or "platanito" (Passiflora tripartita) collected in an orchard in Chitejé de Garabato, SMT

“Quelites” (edible wild greens)

At least seven species have been identified as “quelites” (Fig. 11). Those belonging to the genus Amaranthus are eaten before flowering, because the taste becomes unpleasant. "nabo quelite" (Brassica rapa L.) stems acquire a sweet taste when roasted ("sweated"). Some “quelites” such as "hyadi k’ani" (sun “quelite”), "mal casada" (“badly married”), or "burro quelite" (Tauschia nudicaulis Schltdl.) grow either in the rainy season or in the dry season, and can be eaten with their flowers. Some “quelites” such as "patitas de pájaro" or "chivitas" (Calandrinia ciliata (Ruiz & Pav.) DC.) are eaten raw, as a salad with added lemon. Most of them are boiled and cooked with onion, garlic, and some sauce, and eaten in maize tortilla tacos.

Fig. 11
figure 11

“Quelites” from San Miguel Tlaxcaltepec. a purslane (Portulaca oleracea), b white goosefoot (Chenopodium berlandieri), c watercress (Nasturtium officinale), d wild borage (Sonchus oleraceus), e common mallow (Malva parviflora), f "patita de pájaro" or "chivitas" (Calandrinia ciliata), and g "quelite de burro" (Tauschia nudicaulis)

Sweets/desserts

This category includes species used in the preparation of various preserves such as syrups of figs (Ficus carica L.), pears (Pyrus communis L.), apples (Malus domestica (Suckow) Borkh.), black cherries (Prunus serotina), and quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.). It also includes syrup elderberry jam (Sambucus mexicana), compotes, and desserts made with piloncillo (unrefined whole cane sugar) and pumpkin (Cucurbita spp.), chilacayota (Cucurbita ficifolia Bouché), tejocote (Crataegus mexicana DC.), or amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) delicacies.

Fruits

This category includes species whose fruits that are eaten raw and are naturally sweet, such as pears (Pyrus communis), apples (Malus domestica), “capulínes” (Prunus serotina), “tejocotes” (Crataegus mexicana), prickly pears (Opuntia spp.), and “garambullos” (Myrtillocactus geometrizans (Mart. ex Pfeiff.) Console).

Condiments or spices

Species classified as condiments or spices are added in small amounts to stews or soups to enhance the flavor and include “epazote” (Dysphania ambrosioides (L.) Mosyakin & Clemants) and Mexican bay leaf (Litsea glaucescens). However, species such as "anis de monte" (Tagetes filifolia Lag. and T. micrantha Cav.) are also used to enhance the flavor of raw, freshly cut maize canes which are eaten by sucking the juice from the stalks and rubbing them with the fresh aniseed.

Stews

Most stews are eaten in tacos. Newly harvested potatoes, or "white potatoes" (Solanum tuberosum L.), were preferably roasted on the stove and served with fresh milk for children's breakfast. Today, potatoes are incorporated into the stews with meat (Fig. 12a), sauces, or with nopales (Opuntia spp. cladodes). "Talayotes" or "puerquitos" (Matelea pedulculata (Decne.) Woodson) grow during the rainy season, and although they can be eaten raw (as a snack), they are preferably eaten roasted. “Talayotes” and “puerquitos” can be eaten even if they are not tender. The “quelites” are also often used in stews (Fig. 12e).

Fig. 12
figure 12

Stews and sauces in a molcajete (mortar and pestle) from the SMT edible plants. a "white potatoes" (Solanum tuberosum) with meat; b cooked “nopalitos” (Opuntia spp.) for “tacos”; c “chilacayote” (Cucurbita ficifolia) stew; d "chile manzano" (Capsicum pubescens) hot sauce; e “quelite cenizo” (Chenopodium berlandieri) patties

Sauces

Informants mentioned that about 30 years ago many plants of "chimpinas" or wild eggplants (Lycianthes moziniana (Dunal) Bitter) could be found in the maize fields and surrounding areas. People could collect so many that they would braid them together by weaving the fruit stems. These braids were eaten raw like tomatoes. Apparently, they lasted for many weeks because the braids were hung in the kitchens to have the "chimpinas" available when making a chili sauce.

Another highly valued species for sauces is the "coconoxtle" (Opuntia joconostle), with different fruit colors: white, orange, red, and pink, some with a more acidic taste than others. They also mention the "aguses" (Physalis spp.) as being important for the preparation of green sauces when used raw (orange or yellow when ripe) because they have a very pleasant taste a little sweet like the "chimpinas".

The sauces are made with “chiles” from the communities. The "chiles manzanos" (Capsicum pubescens Ruiz & Pav.) are the most common in backyards, although the "chile piquín" (C. annuum var. glabriusculum) and the "chile campana" (C. baccatum L.) are grown in greenhouses (Fig. 12d).

“Hacer rendir la masa” (increasing the corn dough volume)

Another category is considered for the plants that are used as additives in the dough when there is not enough corn have been harvested to make tortillas. Thus, parts of some plants are added to the dough, such as the male maize spikes (Zea mays), “dalia” flowers (Dahlia coccinea), “lengua de vaca” seeds (Rumex sp.), and "tumbavaqueros" flowers (Ipomoea stans Cav.). These four species are not currently used as such, but it was common for people between the ages of 40 and 60 to mention them as a strategy used by their parents when poor harvests left families without enough maize, thus leading to hunger.

Soups

In the past, it was usual to cook white potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) especially in a "white soup" to ward off the cold. The "coconoxtle" prickly pear is used to prepare broths with meat and the guajillo chili (Capsicum annum) to enhance the flavor. Pumpkin flowers (Cucurbita pepo) were used in the past to thicken soup broths as if it were chicken broth.

Seeds (grains)

The two bean species (Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. coccineus L.) occurring in the area, play a fundamental role in the diet. For P. vulgaris, at least 18 varieties were mentioned by respondents. These are known by common names such as “San Franciscano,” “vaquita,” “negro vaquita,” “rojo,” “ojo de cabra,” “negrito,” “moro,” and “amarillo” (Fig. 13). With regard to maize (Zea mays), 15 types were mentioned, corresponding to seven identified races (Table 4).

Fig. 13
figure 13

Some types of beans produced in the fields and plots of SMT. ag Phaseolus vulgaris, hi Phaseolus coccineus

Table 4 Local names for corn races and varieties

This category contains broad-leafed cultivated plants species such lettuce (Lactuca sativa) or garden “quelites,” such as “patita de pájaro” (Calandrinia ciliata), which can be eaten raw and are used in various dishes.

Bread/cookies

Sweet bread is made with one of the two anise species, Tagetes filifolia or T. micrantha, especially from their seeds.

Secondary uses of some edible species

In addition to the direct consumption of most of the edible species, the interviews revealed three plant species associated with other culturally important food resources, “huitlacoche” (Ustilago maydis (DC.) Corda), “panchihuas” or “lulitos” (Quercus spp. galls), and madrone worms. The first case, it is the fungus associated with the ears of corn (Zea mays). The second case is the oak galls caused by various wasp species which promote a special tissue in response to the wasps' oviposition. Galls are called “panchihuas” or “lulitos” which means fruits in Hñäñho (Otomi). The third name refers to the caterpillars of a particular butterfly species found on the madrone tree (Arbutus sp.), which many years ago were roasted and eaten in tacos with salsa. To extract the caterpillars, the "little bag," full of them needs to be open. This resource is now extinct in the area because madrone trees became progressively scarce and no new plants have appeared.

Among some plants used to preserve food, is the "pextó chiquito" (Brickellia veronicifolia (Kunth) A.Gray). Although is not directly consumed, it is used to put it in a hole excavated in the rosette top left after to cut off the inflorescence stalk of “maguey”” (Agave spp.) in order to extract the sap that we call “aguamiel.” This plant prevents spoiling the sap “aguamiel” used for fermentation to prepare pulque. It is worth noting that this “pextó” species has medicinal uses due to its bitter taste and probably contains antibiotic compounds that prevent the proliferation of fermenting microorganisms in the freshly extracted “aguamiel.”

Potentially toxic species and their way of use

Out of the 119 species recorded in the study area, some have edible parts that are completely harmless. Other plants have edible parts that should be consumed in small quantities to avoid toxicity, such as “madroño” (Arbutus sp.) fruits. Some other species have toxic parts that must not be eaten, such as the “congrá” or “congora” (Phytolacca icosandra L.), whose tender shoots, before flowering, are eaten as greens. However, the leaves must be beaten on a stone and then boiled, drained, and stewed before consumption. The fruits of this species, which resemble cherries, should not be eaten as they are highly poisonous. The fruits were used in the past as a stain remover and laundry detergent.

Discussion

Importance of species diversity compared to other studies

Our study gives highlights about the edible plants management in a ñäñho area, which has been scarcely investigated from the plant uses perspective. In this research we found that 51.3% of the edible plants are not cultivated and they are managed like wild or weedy plants. These results contrast with a recent publication of Casas et al. which report that 21.9% of the edible plant species are wild and weedy edible plants in some indigenous areas in the mountains of Mexico [31].

In this study, 119 edible species were recorded in the SMT community, occurring in different agroecosystems. Of these, 64 (54%) were also found by Núñez [13], who identified 116 edible species in the Ñäñho communities of San Ildefonso and Santiago Mexquititlán. The author mentions six species with medicinal use only, such as “cedrón” (Aloysia citrodora), nettle (Urtica dioica), “trompetilla” (Bouvardia ternifolia), oak (Quercus sp.), “tumbavaqueros” (Ipomoea stans), and “pericón” (Tagetes lucida), but these species are also recorded as edible in the present study. In addition, he mentions only one species with ornamental use (Dahlia sp.), although it is edible. For the “nopales” (Opuntia spp.) and “magueys” (Agave spp.), the author did not specify the different species, and they were considered as one species.

We found 56% of the edible plants reported by Balcázar-Quiñonez [10] of the “milpa” and its surroundings in the Otomi community of San Pedro Arriba, municipality of Temoaya, state of Mexico. This indicates a significant similarity in the knowledge and use of edible plants in the two states, although with some variations, which also implies a considerable cultural and gastronomic diversity related to agrobiodiversity.

The fact that the majority of species were found in five agroecosystems (orchard with 14 spp., greenhouse with 13, household “milpa” with 12, mountain hill with 11, and backyard with 10) implies that these agroecosystems are agrobiodiversity reservoirs. To preserve them, efforts should be made to keep them as heterogeneous as possible but complementary to the biocultural landscape, including wild areas, which host a wealth of local foods.

The importance of wild species for the cultivated agrobiodiversity

Agrobiodiversity represents a pool source of genes for new plant varieties. Wild species serve as genetic diversity reservoirs, providing variable responses to an increasingly uncertain environment due to climate change and knowledge loss [32]. In this study, three species of wild domesticated crop relatives were found (Phaseolus coccineus, P. vulgaris, and Physalis phiadelphica), as well as a congeneric species (Physalis cinerascens) that could exchange genes with crops to increase their genetic diversity. Both cultivated and apparently wild plants of the “bayocote” bean (Phaseolus coccineus) were found. They grew on the edges of oak forests and were not used for food because of their tiny seeds. In terms of intrageneric diversity, more than one species of Agave, Amaranthus, Tagetes, Opuntia, Cucurbita, Phaseolus, Quercus, Physalis, and Solanum were found. The potential gene exchange and genetic affinity among the species within each genus should be investigated.

Percentage of edible species in relation to the municipal flora.

The number of species included in this work is 119, based on the collection of 196 herbarium specimens. Considering the work of Hernández-Sandoval and Pantoja (in press), who documented 499 species based on 725 herbarium specimens for the entire municipality of Amealco, 25% of the plant diversity recorded for the municipality are edible (Table 5). Considering the study by Rzedowski and Bedolla [33], who reported the presence of 580 species in the municipality, the edible plants in this study represent 20% of such diversity.

Table 5 Comparison between the total plant diversity recorded in previous studies and the present study focused on the diversity of edible plants

People knowledge

The knowledge index was not a study goal. However, the people collaborating in the research showed an important plant cultural background + baggage. They knew the Ñäñho plant names, uses, places where they grow, and recipes among other information. Most of the time, they were happy and proud to share all of what they knew about the plants. Unfortunately, since most of them are more than 60 years old, their knowledge is at risk of being lost. A major effort is needed to preserve not only the edible plant species used, but also the people’s knowledge and cultural values. This study aspires to be a contribution to action in favor of conserving the local cultural memory.

It is important to consider the cultural practices surrounding food consumption around the more significant plant species and their varieties. During field work, especially in the informal interviews and participant observations, we documented some dietary practices related to traditional festivities in the community. A relevant example is the preparation and consumption of the traditional fermented beverage of maize called “senditó.” It is consumed traditionally in May and September during the patron saint festivities of San Miguel Arcangel, in December during Christmas day, and on the last day of the year. Other interesting beverages, related to specific cultural moments, are the orange leaf tea consumed during the Day of the Dead in November and the “atole de masa” (not fermented beverage made with maize dough) that are consumed by the women in the puerperium. Some of the interviewees mention that some years ago the tortillas consumed during the baptism party had to be made with red or pink maize. Now, it is very difficult to obtain this color of maize.

Agrochemicals and the disappearance of edible plants

The “quelite patita de pájaro" (Calandrinia micrantha) was found in a greenhouse located on land where a “milpa” had been cultivated many years ago. People mentioned that it was abundant before the arrival of herbicides, but now is very rare. Another group of plants that are practically extinct in the study area are the "papas de “milpa” (“milpa” potatoes, Solanum spp.). They are also known as "papas de monte" (wild potatoes) and sometimes called "papas de coyote" when they grow on the hillside. These species were eradicated from the “milpa” after the use of herbicides.

There is an urgent need to develop propagation and reintroduction projects for the species that were known in the past as important for food, but are no longer easily found in the field. These species include the "chivitas" or "patitas de pájaro" (Calandrinia micrantha), "chimpinas" or "berenjenas de monte" (Lycianthes moziniana), "talayotes" or "puerquitos" (Matelea pedulculata), "auguses" (Physalis chenopodifolia), "papas de “milpa” (Solanum spp.), and some maize and bean cultivars that are no longer cultivated, such as red or pink maize (Zea mays), which are drought-tolerant.

The species found in different agroecosystems and vegetation types and the importance of their conservation

The study revealed a significant diversity of edible plant species growing in different agroecosystems and vegetation types. The food potential inherent in each ecosystem or agroecosystem is exploited by farmers through the strategy of "multiple use," an approach that recognizes and utilizes the productive ecosystems capacities. Though the study objective was to document plant agrodiversity, the results refer to the appropriation of multiple ecosystems, with many species producing different products through a variety of production practices, thus ensuring food diversity [34].

In this regard, the SMT inhabitants obtain edible plant species from different environments (agroecosystems) in addition to the “milpa,” the backyard, and natural vegetation (the mountain hill), [5, 6]. Plants are managed in different ways ranging from gathering to sowing and planting. The environment’s combination, plant management type, and their seasonal availability (a topic to be explored in future research), together with local knowledge of their use, constitute an agrobiological and cultural wealth from which to build food sovereignty. Some publications [4, 34] support the idea that "ethno agroforestry systems represent a real commitment to a future that seeks to solve problems of food and raw material supply in a way that is friendly to planetary ecosystems." These authors suggest that agroforestry management is an alternative to modern agricultural models since modern agriculture is one of the main drivers for global environmental change. In particular, the agriculture for products exportation or to support large cities, the industrialization and urbanization tendencies in Southern Querétaro, are impoverishing the productive ecosystems and their diversity. The results of this study provide an insight for supporting alternative food production systems based on local knowledge.

Potential uses of collected species that are not consumed

In addition to the 119 documented edible species, there are others that are consumed outside the study area, but were not reported as edible in SMT. For example, Anoda cristata was collected in two “milpas,” and although the respondents did not know its name and had not consumed it, they were aware that it was eaten elsewhere. In other parts of Mexico, this species is consumed as a “quelite” and is known as “alache or wild mallow, recognized for its high protein value [35]. In the study area, the wild mallow refers to a different species, Malva parviflora.

Common species in decline and the potential of underutilized species

As mentioned above, some species were important in the diet in the past but now are less consumed, even if they are common in the community landscape. Some other species whose consumption is declining are those considered by the people to be "mountain foods", consumed by people during the working day when collecting firewood from the forest or during pastoral activities, which is mainly done by the children. These include “dalia” (Dahlia coccinea) tubers, oaks (at least three species of Quercus) galls and flowers, and the mountain prickly pears (Opuntia spp.), among which the “coconoxtles” (O. joconoxtle) stand out.

According to Bravo et al. [36], plants that are both currently used and those that are no longer used, but were widely consumed in the past, have a significant potential to diversify diets and to improve local economies in the present. In the case of edible oak flowers (Quercus rugosa and Q. eduardii), “tumbavaqueros” (Ipomoea stans), “maguey” (A. americana and A. salmiana), “colorín” (Erythrina sp.), maize (Zea mays), “dalia” (Dahlia coccinea), madrone (Arbutus sp.), and prickly pear (Opuntia sp.), their consumption is underutilized.

On the origin of plant species (native vs. introduced)

Introduced species represent 40% of the diversity of edible plants and play an important role in supplementing the basic native species diet. The fact that most introduced species are cultivated, indicates that a diet based on such management requires considerable time and care, i.e., a high-intensity management to obtain food.

Introduced species are mostly present in greenhouses and gardens, indicating that these agroecosystems require high-intensity management intensity. In contrast, native species are abundant in the home “milpa” and in the mountain hills. Some introduced plants come from the Andes, such as the chile “manzano” (Capsicum pubescens) and the “granada” (Passiflora tripartita), but they are locally highly valued as edible plants.

Importance of edible plants for survival

Species that are gathered or collected are considered to be the basis of a survival diet in emergencies caused by the lack of cultivated species production. The agroecosystems where most of the wild plants are collected are the mountain hills, home “milpa,” and the backyard, and to a lesser extent, the ejidal “milpa.” It is essential to preserve these agroecosystems as food sources for food security. During the interviews, the importance of the mountain hill prickly pears (Opuntia spp.) was highlighted as a staple food during the pandemic period, in the context of economic and commercial food scarcity.

The importance of this work for local nutrition and its contribution to strengthening food sovereignty

Of the 29 listed “quelites” species, 14 genera (Amaranthus, Hydrocotyle, Brassica, Chenopodium, Tinantia, Ipomoea, Malva, Oxalis, Phytolacca, Rumex, Calandrinia, Jaltomata, Solanum, and Urtica) have been identified by the Quelites network as a national priority for their conservation and sustainable use [9]. National resources can be directed toward the development of projects to promote these species as food.

It is important to compile in a single work information on the diversity, local names, origin, management, and uses of edible plants. This will provide the basis for projects aimed at strengthening food sovereignty processes. These can follow integrated development schemes that include primary production (propagation), processing (diversification of uses and forms of consumption), and local commercialization of derived products (community entrepreneurship projects). Above all, they provide a context for inhabitants of the community to have an adequate diet based on their own culture and agrobiological diversity.

The local production and consumption of these underutilized species can be a source of nutrients and culturally relevant food throughout the year, which are enriched after the rainy season. The local plant agrodiversity, local names, origin, management, and use of edible plants documentation, could work toward both food sovereignty and food security, with an ecological basis for achieving food self-sufficiency [34].

Conclusions

At least 119 species of edible plants from 11 used agroecosystems were identified in the SMT, with the garden, greenhouse, house “milpa,” and mountain hills having the greatest diversity. Most of the edible species are native (71 spp., 60%), and almost half of them were collected from different agroecosystems, mainly the mountain hill and “milpa” near the houses. This implies that these spaces are important food sources that require little management and could potentially designing sustainable and culturally relevant diets. The main plant management types are: sowing or planting and gathering, and these species are mainly found in the gardens, backyards, and greenhouses. In contrast, collected species are mainly found in the mountain hills, home “milpa,” and backyards. Although 85 names of edible plants were recorded in the Hñäñho language, there is an erosion of the plant names knowledge and their consumption, especially among people younger than 65 years old. In the study area, edible plants are used in different ways by consuming different parts of the plant in different categories and forms of consumption. This indicates the cultural diversity and richness of the area and the potential to form the basis of local food sovereignty.

Availability of data and materials

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Abbreviations

SMT:

San Miguel Tlaxcaltepec

B:

Backyard

D:

Dam plots

EM:

Ejidal “milpa”

G:

Greenhouse

H:

Mountain hill

HM:

Home “milpa”

N:

“Nopaleras”

O:

Orchard

P:

Plain

S:

Stream bank

G:

Gathered or collected

T:

Tolerated

P:

Promoted

Tr:

Transplanted

S:

Sowed and planted

References

  1. Toledo VM, Barrera-Bassols N. La memoria biocultural: la importancia ecológica de las sabidurías tradicionales. Icaria Editorial; 2008.

  2. Massimo Montanari. Montanari, M. La Comida Como Cultura [ocr] [2004] [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2024 Jun 26]. Available from: http://archive.org/details/montanari-m.-la-comida-como-cultura-ocr-2004

  3. Silva Rivera E, Martínez Valdés V, Lascurain M, Rodríguez-Luna E, editors. De la recolección a los agroecosistemas: soberanía alimentaria y conservación de la biodiversidad. Primera edición. Xalapa, Ver., México: Universidad Veracruzana; 2018.

  4. Moreno Calles AI, Casas A, Toledo VM, Vallejo Ramos M. Etnoagroforestería en México [Internet]. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2017 [cited 2024 Jun 26]. Available from: https://librosoa.unam.mx/handle/123456789/248

  5. Casas A, Parra F. Agrobiodiversidad, parientes silvestres y cultura. LEISA Rev Agroecol. 2007;23:5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Indígenas I| IN de los P, Boege. El patrimonio biocultural de los pueblos indígenas de México. [Internet]. gob.mx. [cited 2024 Jun 26]. Available from: http://www.gob.mx/inpi/documentos/el-patrimonio-biocultural-de-los-pueblos-indigenas-de-mexico

  7. Casas A, Caballero J, Mapes C, Zárate S. Manejo de la Vegetación, domesticación de plantas y origen de la agricultura en Mesoamérica. Bol Soc Botánica México. 1997;61:31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mapes C, Basurto F. Biodiversity and edible plants of Mexico. In: Lira R, Casas A, Blancas J, editors. Ethnobotany of Mexico. Ethnobiology. New York, NY: Springer; 2016. pp. 83–131.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Solís Aguilar G, María L, Castro D, López L, Hernández R, Casanova E, et al. Conservación y aprovechamiento sostenible de especies vegetales tradicionales de México. Servicio Nacional de Inspección y Certificación de Semillas y Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo. México; 2017. p. 108.

  10. Balcázar-Quiñones A, White-Olascoaga L, Chávez-Mejía C, Zepeda-Gómez C. Los quelites: riqueza de especies y conocimiento tradicional en la comunidad otomí de San Pedro Arriba, Temoaya, Estado de México. Polibotánica. 2020;49:219–42.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Salas SMP, Aguilar-Galván F, Sandoval LH. Plantas silvestres comestibles de La Barreta, Querétaro, México y su papel en la cultura alimentaria local. Etnobiología. 2021;19:41–62.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Martínez Puente JA, Chávez Hernández ÁJ, editors. Ciclos sociales y culturales del maíz en San Ildelfonso Tultepec, Amealco, Querétaro. México: Fondo editorial de Querétaro; 2015.

  13. López RAN. Fitonimia hñäñho: una aproximación a la etnotaxonomía de la flora útil del pueblo ñähño de Amealco, Querétaro. 2014 [cited 2024 Jun 26]; Available from: https://ri-ng.uaq.mx/handle/123456789/7338

  14. Hernández-Sandoval L, Santos RG, Puente KNH. Catálogo de semilla nativa y naturalizada de tres comunidades indígenas de Amealco, Querétaro: Volúmen I. Fondo Editorial Universitario; 2024.

  15. Bara CR, González-Santos R, Morales SLC, Hernández-Sandoval L, Hernández-Puente KN. Sistemas locales de producción y redes alimentarias alternativas en Amealco de Bonfil, Querétaro, México. Debates En Sociol. 2023;57:244–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. González-Santos R, Hernández-Sandoval L, Hernández-Puente KN, Ortega-Paczka R. Distribución y caracterización ecogeográfica de maíces nativos de Querétaro, México. Rev Fitotec Mex. 2023;46:341–341.

    Google Scholar 

  17. López-Ugalde R. Ar hoahi ar tha. La milpa y los maíces criollos de San Miguel Tlaxcaltepec. Patrimonio Queretano. [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Jun 24]. Available from: http://www.patrimonioqueretano.gob.mx/

  18. Barrios E. Significados del maíz y fiesta. El caso de los campesinos de San Miguel Tlaxcaltepec, Amealco. 2020 [cited 2024 Jun 26]; Available from: https://ri-ng.uaq.mx/handle/123456789/2451

  19. Hernández-Sadoval, L. P Y. Programa de ordenamiento ecológico y territorial del municipio de Amealco de Bonfil, Queretaro, Mexico [Internet]. Municipio de Amealco; 2018 [cited 2024 Jun 26]. Available from: https://www.amealco.gob.mx/transparencia/httpdocs/PDF/toda%20informacion%20de%20utilidad/RESUMEN%20POEL.pdf

  20. Delgado-Salias A, Caballero J, Casas A. Crop domestication in Mesoamerica. 2004. p. 1–4.

  21. Leyva-Trinidad DA, Pérez-Vázquez A, Bezerra da Costa I, Formighieri Giordani RC, Leyva-Trinidad DA, Pérez-Vázquez A, et al. El papel de la milpa en la seguridad alimentaria y nutricional en hogares de Ocotal Texizapan, Veracruz, México. Polibotánica. 2020;50:279–99.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Morrone JJ. Regionalización biogeográfica y evolución biótica de México: Encrucijada de la biodiversidad del Nuevo Mundo. Rev Mex de Biodiversidad. 2019;90:1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Estadísticas de pobreza en Querétaro [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jun 26]. Available from: https://www.coneval.org.mx/coordinacion/entidades/Queretaro/Paginas/principal.aspx

  24. 22malim10.png (960×720) [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jun 26]. Available from: https://www.coneval.org.mx/coordinacion/entidades/PublishingImages/Queretaro/pob_municipal/22malim10.png

  25. Newing H, Eagle CM, Puri R, Watson CW. Conducting research in conservation: Social science methods and practice. Conduct. Res. Conserv. Soc. Sci. Methods Pract. 2010. p. 376.

  26. Hekking E. He’mi mpomuhñä ar hñäÑho ar hÑämfo ndämaxei = Diccionario bilingüe otomí-español del Estado de Querétaro / Ewald Ferdinand Rudolf Hekking Sloof, Severiano André de Jesús, Paula de Santiago Quintanar, Alonso Guerrero Galván, Roberto Aurelio Nuñez López. México, D.F. : Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas, 2010-;

  27. González González J, Novelo Maldonado E. Algas. In A. Lot & F. Chiang (Eds.), Manual de Herbario. Administración y manejo de colecciones, técnicas de recolección y preparación de ejemplares botánicos. 47–54 [Internet]. 1986 [cited 2024 Jun 26]; Available from: http://repositorio.fciencias.unam.mx:8080/xmlui/handle/11154/141470

  28. Tropicos - Home [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jun 26]. Available from: https://www.tropicos.org/home

  29. Plants of the World Online | Kew Science [Internet]. Plants World Online. [cited 2024 Jun 26]. Available from: https://powo.science.kew.org/

  30. Rao NK, Hanson J, Dulloo ME, Ghosh K, Nowell D, Larinde M. Manual para el manejo de semillas en bancos de germoplasma. 2007 [cited 2024 Jun 26]; Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/1946

  31. Casas A, Farfán-Heredia B, Camou-Guerrero A, Torres-García I, Blancas Vázquez JJ, Rangel-Landa S. Wild, weedy and domesticated plants for food security and sovereignty. In: Casas A, BlancasVázquez JJ, editors. Ethnobot Mt Reg Mex. Cham: Springer; 2023. p. 97–127. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-3-030-99357-3_3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. SEMARNAT [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jun 26]. Available from: https://apps1.semarnat.gob.mx:8443/dgeia/compendio_2018/dgeiawf.semarnat.gob.mx_8080/ibi_apps/WFServleta8ce.html

  33. Rzedowski J, García BYB. Fascículo complementario XXXVII: catálogo de especies de plantas vasculares registradas del estado de Querétaro [Internet]. Flora Bajío. Flora del Bajío; 2021 [cited 2024 Jun 26]. Available from: https://libros.inecol.mx/index.php/FB/catalog/download/547/661/3223

  34. Toledo VM, Carabias Lillo J, Mapes C, Toledo C, editors. Ecología y autosuficiencia alimentaria: hacia una opción basada en la diversidad biológica, ecológica y cultural de México. Quinta edición. México: Siglo XXI de España Editores; 2000.

  35. Bernal-Ramírez LA, Bravo-Avilez D, Fornoni J, Valverde PL, Rendón-Aguilar B, Bernal-Ramírez LA, et al. Efecto de la selección humana sobre rasgos seleccionados y correlacionados en Anoda cristata (L.) Schltdl. (Malvaceae). Bot Sci. 2021;99:342–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bravo M, Arteaga MI, Herrera FF. Bioinventario de especies subutilizadas comestibles y medicinales en el norte de Venezuela. Bol Latinoam Caribe Plantas Med Aromáticas. 2017;16:347–60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author thanks the Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro for facilitating the development of this work, which is derived from the doctoral thesis of the Doctorate in Biological Sciences program at the Faculty of Natural Sciences of UAQ. The authors thank the inhabitants of the community of San Miguel Tlaxcaltepec, especially the Organizing Committee of the Native Corn and “milpa” Fair, for facilitating the interviews in the area, as well as the Hñähño speakers who preserve the legacy of the Otomí language and shared the plant names with us. Thanks also to Diego Ugalde de Haene for his support during the interviews with the language speakers and for his willingness to transcribe names.

Funding

We thank the Fondo para el Fortalecimiento de la Investigación de la UAQ (FONDEC-2021) for economic support of project FNB202106.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KNHP helped in original idea, fieldwork: interviews and plant material collection, data analysis, manuscript writing. LHS contributed to original idea and project conception, plant identification, discussion, manuscript writing and reviewing. RGS was involved in project structuration, fieldwork: interviews and plant germplasm collection, map elaboration. AC helped in project conception, ethnobotanical information revision, manuscript content, and English revision. MM contributed to plant identification, botanical structures used revision, and specific information on Solanaceae, and aquatic plants, manuscript revision. VS was involved in collecting botanical information for Euphorbiaceae, Urticaceae and phytogeographical origin revision, manuscript content, and English revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Hernández-Sandoval.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The content of the manuscript has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. The study information is original and the informants agreed to contribute with their edible plants knowledge and to donate samples from their lands to make herbarium specimens or for the university germplasm bank. Permission was verbally obtained from all participants in this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Appendix

Appendix

Edible plants in San Miguel Tlaxcaltepec, Amealco, Querétaro. Agroecosystems (B = Backyard, D = Dam plots, EM = Ejidal “milpa,” G = Greenhouse, H = Mountain hill, HM = Home “milpa,” N = “Nopaleras,” O = Orchard, P = Plain, S = Steam bank). Management type G: Gathered or collected, T: Tolerated, P: Promoted, Tr: Transplanted, S: Sowed and planted. Plants with voucher number in process have photographic records of the species.

Scientific name

Family

Vaucher number

Spanish name

Hñäñho name

Agroecosystem

Type of management

Origin

Agave americana L

Asparagaceae

QMEX00019101

maguey verde

'wada

H, HM

Tr, R

Native

Agave mapisaga Trel

Asparagaceae

in process

maguey

'wada

H, HM

Tr, G

Native

Agave salmiana Otto ex Salm-Dyck

Asparagaceae

QMEX00019097

maguey chino

'wada

H, HM

Tr, G

Native

Allium cepa L

Amaryllidaceae

in process

cebolla

denxi

O, G

S

Introduced

Allium fistulosum L

Amaryllidaceae

in process

cebollin

 

O

S

Introduced

Allium sativum L

Amaryllidaceae

in process

ajo

axo

O

S

Introduced

Aloysia citrodora Paláu

Verbenaceae

in process

cedrón

 

B

S

Introduced

Amaranthus hybridus L

Amaranthaceae

QMEX00019107

quintonil blanco, quintonil rayado

xitha

HM, EM, B

G, T, P

Native

Amaranthus hypochondriacus L

Amaranthaceae

QMEX00019080

amaranto

 

HM, B

S

Native

Apium graveolens L

Apiaceae

in process

apio

 

G

S

Introduced

Arbutus tessellata P.D. Sørensen

Ericaceae

QMEX00019154

madroño

t'axi (listo), penxi (peludo)

H

G

Native

Arctostaphylos pungens Kunth

Ericaceae

in process

pingüica

pindikua

H

G

Native

Avena sativa L

Poaceae

in process

avena

 

EM

S

Introduced

Beta vulgaris subsp. cicla (L.) Juel, E.Markl. & Örtendahl

Amaranthaceae

in process

acelga

 

O, G

S

Introduced

Bouvardia ternifolia (Cav.) Schltdl

Rubiaceae

QMEX00019158

trompetilla

dot'i

H

G

Native

Brassica oleracea L

Brassicaceae

in process

coliflor, coles, coles de bruselas, brócoli

 

G

S

Introduced

Brassica rapa L

Brassicaceae

QMEX00019077, QMEX00019105

nabo

nobo, nabo

HM, EM,B

G, T, P, S

Introducida

Brikellia veronicifolia (Kunth) A.Gray

Asteraceae

QMEX00019138

hierba del burro, pextó chiquito

 

H

G

Native

Calandrinia ciliata (Ruiz & Pav.) DC

Montiaceae

QMEX00019103

patita de pájaro

mudu k'ani

G, HM

G, T, P, S, Tr

Nativa

Capsicum annum L

Solanaceae

QMEX00019108

chile jalapeño, chile morrón

'ñii/ 'ii

G

S

Native

Capsicum baccatum L

Solanaceae

in process

chile campana

'ñii/ 'ii

G

S

Native

Capsicum pubescens Ruiz & Pav

Solanaceae

QMEX00019095

chile manzano

'ñii/ 'ii

B

S

Introduced

Casimiroa edulis La Llave

Rutaceae

QMEX00019088

zapote

t'axi mu zaa, mu zaa

O, B

S

Native

Chenopodium berlandieri Moq

Amaranthaceae

QMEX00019124

quelite cenizo blanco y rojo, huazontle

gink'ani, gik'ni

HM, EM, P

G, T, P, S

Native

Citrus × aurantiifolia (Christm.) Swingle

Rutaceae

in process

lima

 

O

S

Introduced

Citrus × aurantium f. aurantium

Rutaceae

in process

naranja

nanxa

O, B

S

Introduced

Citrus × limon (L.) Osbeck

Rutaceae

QMEX00021407

limón

 

O, HM, B

S

Introduced

Clinopodium macrostemum (Moc. & Sessé ex Benth.) Kuntze

Lamiaceae

QMEX00019139, QMEX00019155

tlachicote, té de monte

 

H, B

G

Native

Cologania angustifolia Kunth

Fabaceae

QMEX00019127, QMEX00019159

jícama 2

jwaxo

H

G

Native

Coriandrum sativum L

Apiaceae

QMEX00019141

cilantro

 

G

S

Introduced

Crataegus mexicana DC

Rosaceae

QMEX00019157

tejocote

peni

O

G, T, S

Native

Cucurbita argyrosperma C.Huber

Cucurbitaceae

in process, seed bank

calabaza pipiana

mu, muu

HM

S

Native

Cucurbita ficifolia Bouché

Cucurbitaceae

in process

chilacayota

demu

HM

S

Native

Cucurbita pepo L

Cucurbitaceae

in process

calabaza boluda grande o de castilla, bolita, de rancho, criolla, semillera

mu, muu

HM

S

Native

Cydonia oblonga Mill

Rosaceae

in process

membrillo

 

O

S

Introduced

Dahlia coccinea Cav

Asteraceae

QMEX00019125, QMEX00019126

jícama de dalia de monte o cimarrona

daliya, mpixidoni o za'do (camote)

H

G

Native

Daucus carota L

Apiaceae

in process

zanahoria

 

G

S

Introduced

Dysphania ambrosioides (L.) Mosyakin & Clemants

Amaranthaceae

QMEX00019121, QMEX00019121

epazote

 

B

G, T, P, S

Native

Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl

Rosaceae

in process

níspero

 

O, B

S

Introduced

Eruca sativa Mill

Brassicaceae

in process

arúgula

 

G

S

Introduced

Erythranthe geyeri (Torr.) G.L.Nesom

Phrymaceae

QMEX00019145

berro cimarrón

 

S

G

Introduced

Erythrina americana Mill

Fabaceae

QMEX00019096

colorín

 

O

G

Native

Ficus carica L

Moraceae

QMEX00019091

higo

 

O, G, B

S

Introduced

Fragaria sp.

Rosaceae

in process

fresas

 

G

S

Introduced

Hordeum vulgare L

Poaceae

in process

cebada

 

EM

S

Introduced

Hydrocotyle sp. Tourn. ex L

Araliaceae

in process

berro ombligo de puerco

 

S

G

Native

Ipomea batatas (L.) Lam

Convolvulaceae

in process

camote

buijo

G

S

Nativa

Ipomoea stans Cav

Convolvulaceae

QMEX00021411

tumbavaqueros

 

HM

G

Native

Jaltomata procumbens (Cav.) J.L. Gentry

Solanaceae

QMEX00019143

jaltomate, negritos, negros y jaltomate blanco

dihpi, depe, 'bodepe

HM, B

G, T

Native

Justicia spicigera Schltdl

Acanthaceae

QMEX00019089

muicle

 

B

S

Native

Lactuca sativa var. longifolia

Asteraceae

in process

lechuga larga

 

G

S

Introduced

Lathyrus oleraceus Lam

Fabaceae

in process

chícharo

gorju, guluju

HM, EM, P

S

Introduced

Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit

Fabaceae

QMEX00019082

guaje de árbol

 

O

S

Native

Litsea glaucescens Kunth

Lauraceae

QMEX00021410

laurel

 

O

S

Native

Loeselia mexicana (Lam.) Brand

Polemoniaceae

QMEX00019085

espinocilla

 

H, HM

G

Native

Lycianthes moziniana (Dunal) Bitter

Solanaceae

QMEX00019149

berenjena de monte, chimpinas

tximpina, nyonge

H, HM, P

G, T

Native

Macroptilium gibbosifolium (Ortega) A.Delgado

Fabaceae

QMEX00019136

jícamita

jwaxo

HM

G

Native

Malva parviflora L

Malvaceae

QMEX00019144

malva, malva de comer

xikoni

HM, EM, B

G, T

Introduced

Malva sylvestris L

Malvaceae

QMEX00019120, QMEX00019152

malva cimarrona

 

HM, EM

G

Introduced

Matelea pedulculata (Decne.) Woodson

Asclepiaceae

QMEX00019113,QMEX00019114

talayote, puerquitos

txi ts'udi

HM

G

Native

Medicago polymorpha L

Fabaceae

QMEX00021413

carretón

karreto

HM, EM

G

Introduced

Morus alba L

Moraceae

QMEX00019078

mora

 

O

S

Introduced

Musa x paradisiaca L

Musaceae

in process

plátano

muzaa, dozaa

G, B

S

Introduced

Myrtillocactus geometrizans (Mart. ex Pfeiff.) Console

Cactaceae

in process

garambuyo

'baxtä

B

T

Native

Nasturtium officinale W.T.Aiton

Brassicaceae

QMEX00019146

berro de comer

'berro

S, M, G

G, Tr

Introduced

Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill

Cactaceae

QMEX00019102

nopal sin espinas o verdulero, sangre de toro

jir doro

O, G, B

S

Native

Opuntia hyptiacantha F.A.C. Weber

Cactaceae

QMEX00019100

nopal chinche

 

N

Tr

Native

Opuntia joconostle F.A.C. Weber ex Diguet

Cactaceae

QMEX00019099

nopal xoconoxtle

ixkähä

HM

G, TG

Native

Opuntia lasiacantha Pfeiff

Cactaceae

QMEX00019093

nopal aguamielo/ lindó, lindón

Xät’ä, theni kähä

H, N

G

Native

Opuntia robusta H.L.Wendl. ex Pfeiff

Cactaceae

in process

nopal bondó

'bondó

H, N

G

Native

Opuntia streptacantha Lem

Cactaceae

QMEX00019094

nopal hartón

 

H, HM, N

G, Tr

Native

Opuntia tomentosa Salm-Dyck

Cactaceae

QMEX00019098

nopal chamacuero

dödé

H, HM, N

G

Native

Oxalis sp.

Oxalidaceae

in process

panocha, agritos

ixi, ixkwa

HM

G

Native

Passiflora tripartita (Juss.) Poir

Passifloraceae

QMEX00019083

granada, platanito

 

O

S

Introduced

Persea americana L

Lauraceae

in process

aguacate

xit'ani

G

S

Native

Phaseolus coccineus L

Fabaceae

QMEX00019128, QMEX00019131

frijol bayocote, frijol burro, ayocote

burrujú

HM, EM

S

Native

Phaseolus vulgaris L

Fabaceae

QMEX00019123

frijol amarillo

bo jú

EM

S

Native

Physalis chenopodiifolia Lem

Solanaceae

QMEX00019110, QMEX00019112

augus

ougú

HM

G

Native

Physalis nicandroides Schltdl

Solanaceae

QMEX00019129

augus

ougú

HM, B

G, T, P, S

Native

Physalis philadelphica Lam

Solanaceae

QMEX00019081

tomate de cáscara, tomate de milpa

t'axdemuxii/ demxii

HM, B

G, T, S

Native

Phytolacca icosandra L

Phytolaccaceae

QMEX00019109, QMEX00019116

congora, hierba del perro

congrá

H, O, HM

G

Native

Pinus cembroides Zucc

Pinaceae

in process

piñón

 

O

S

Native

Portulaca oleracea L

Portulacaceae

QMEX00019118

verdolaga

verdolaga

G, HM, EM

S, G

Native

Prunus armeniaca L

Rosaceae

in process

chabacano

 

O

S

Introduced

Prunus cerasus L

Rosaceae

in process

cerezo

 

O

S

Introduced

Prunus domestica L

Rosaceae

QMEX00019090, QMEX00019140

ciruela

siruelo

O

S

Introduced

Prunus persica (L.) Batsch

Rosaceae

QMEX00019086, QMEX00019092

durazno

ixi

O, HM

S

Introduced

Prunus serotina Ehrh

Rosaceae

QMEX00019161

capulín

dese

H, O, HM

G, T

Native

Psidium guajava L

Lythraceae

in process

guayaba

 

B

S

Native

Punica granatum L

Lythraceae

in process

granada

 

B, G

S

Introduced

Pyrus communis L

Rosaceae

in process

pera

 

O, HM, B

S

Introduced

Pyrus malus L

Rosaceae

in process

manzana roja arenosa

mansana

O, B

S

Introduced

Quercus eduardi Trel

Fagaceae

QMEX00019119

encino

dozaa

H

G

Native

Quercus microphylla Née

Fagaceae

QMEX00019137

panchihuas/lulitos

pantxigua

H

G

Native

Quercus rugosa Née

Fagaceae

QMEX00019087

encino roble

zaa 'ro, lulu mba (panchihua de roble)

B

G

Native

Raphanus raphanistrum L

Brassicaceae

QMEX00019111, QMEX00019160

mortaza, mortaza, pedorra, quelite de burro

 

EM

G, T

Introduced

Rumex crispus L

Polygonaceae

QMEX00019153

lengua de vaca

ixtho

HM, N, B

G

Introduced

Salvia hispanica L

Lamiaceae

in process

chía

 

B

T

Native

Sambucus mexicana C.Presl ex DC

Viburnaceae

in process

sauco

 

B

S

Native

Sicyos edulis Jacq

Cucurbitaceae

in process

chayote liso grande y espinudo mediano

O, B

S

Native

Native

Solanum aff. cardiophyllum Lindl

Solanaceae

QMEX00019130

papa de milpa

'rok'a hwähi

HM, EM

G

Native

Solanum lycopersicum L

Solanaceae

QMEX00019079, QMEX00019084

jitomate

dädemoxi

G

S

Native

Solanum nigrescens M. Martens & Galeotti

Solanaceae

QMEX00019104, QMEX00019135

hierba mora

'pexaa

HM, B

G, T, P

Native

Solanum stoloniferum Schltdl

Solanaceae

QMEX00019117, QMEX00019133, QMEX00019134

papa de coyote, papa de monte

'rok'a 'mi'ño

H

G

Native

Solanum tuberosum L

Solanaceae

in process

papa blanca

'rok'a

G, HM, EM

S

Introduced

Sonchus oleraceus L

Asteraceae

QMEX00019147

borraja de milpa

nk'anjö

EM, H, N, HM

G, T

Introduced

Spinacia oleracea L

Amaranthaceae

in process

espinacas

 

G

S

Introduced

Tagetes filifolia Lag

Asteraceae

QMEX00019115

anís de monte

 

H, HM, P

G

Native

Tagetes micrantha Cav

Asteraceae

QMEX00019148

anís de monte

 

H, HM

G, T

Native

Tauschia nudicaulis Schltdl

Apiaceae

in process

quelite de burro, quelite de la mal casada

Mpintho, k'ani'r hyadi

P, HM

G, T

Native

Tagetes lucida Cav

Asteraceae

QMEX00019156

pericón, santa maría

hmijwä

HM

G

Native

Tigridia sp.

Iridaceae

in process

liendres, cocomite

 

H

G

Native

Tinantia erecta (Jacq.) Fenzl

Commelinaceae

in process

venaditos

 

HM

G, T

Native

Triticum sp.

Poaceae

QMEX00021408

trigo lerma y rojo

t'ei

EM

S

Introdiced

Urtica sp.

Urticaceae

QMEX00021412

ortiga

nzäna

B

G, T, P, S

Native

Vicia faba L

Fabaceae

QMEX00021409

haba chica de puerco

däju

EM, HM

S

Introduced

Vicia lens Coss. & Germ

Fabaceae

In process

lenteja

 

EM

S

Introduced

Yucca guatemalensis Lem

Asparagaceae

in process

palma

denthi, doni denthi

HM, B

Tr

Native

Zea mays L

Poaceae

QMEX00019151, QMEX00019151

maíz

thä

HM

S

Native

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernández-Puente, K.N., Hernández-Sandoval, L., González-Santos, R. et al. Diversity, management, and uses of edible plants in a Ñäñho community of Southern Querétaro, Mexico. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 21, 18 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13002-025-00756-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13002-025-00756-6

Keywords